PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYBF.DE vs. IS3F.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SYBF.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBF.DE) and iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS3F.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYBF.DE achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly lower than IS3F.DE's 5.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SYBF.DE has underperformed IS3F.DE with an annualized return of 2.25%, while IS3F.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 4.24% annualized return.


SYBF.DE

1D
0.07%
1M
1.86%
6M
4.21%
YTD
4.33%
1Y
7.10%
3Y*
3.63%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
2.25%

IS3F.DE

1D
0.34%
1M
1.62%
6M
5.29%
YTD
5.49%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
5.78%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*
4.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYBF.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SYBF.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
4.33%-6.20%11.43%1.73%3.87%8.26%-6.08%7.11%6.39%-11.09%
IS3F.DE
iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.49%-6.28%14.29%7.35%6.51%9.83%-8.41%13.49%1.81%-8.14%

Correlation

The correlation between SYBF.DE and IS3F.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2013

0.78

The correlation between SYBF.DE and IS3F.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (10 years) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYBF.DE vs. IS3F.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYBF.DE
SYBF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SYBF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3F.DE
IS3F.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IS3F.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYBF.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBF.DE) and iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS3F.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SYBF.DEIS3F.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.22

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.76

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.58

7.08

-1.50

SYBF.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYBF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the IS3F.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYBF.DE and IS3F.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SYBF.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYBF.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.15%, roughly equal to the maximum IS3F.DE drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYBF.DE and IS3F.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYBF.DEIS3F.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.15%

-27.25%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

-2.93%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.86%

-11.67%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.57%

-11.67%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.82%

-20.78%

+0.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.39%

-3.40%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.92%

-8.18%

-0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

1.14%

+0.13%

Volatility

SYBF.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBF.DE) is 1.53%, while iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS3F.DE) has a volatility of 1.90%. This indicates that SYBF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3F.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYBF.DEIS3F.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.53%

1.90%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.06%

4.53%

-0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.72%

6.38%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.07%

7.66%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.66%

8.21%

+2.45%

SYBF.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SYBF.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3F.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SYBF.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Dividend Comparison

SYBF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than IS3F.DE's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IS3F.DE
iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.25%4.77%5.36%4.95%2.10%1.50%2.62%3.52%2.81%2.25%2.36%3.21%
SYBF.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
4.51%5.03%4.10%3.10%1.21%1.74%2.86%2.43%1.68%1.77%1.36%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


SYBF.DE and IS3F.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SYBF.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SYBF.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IS3F.DE.

SYBF.DE tracks Bloomberg US Corporate 0-3, while IS3F.DE tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Interest Rate Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SYBF.DE and 0.25% for IS3F.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYBF.DE and IS3F.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer