PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYBF.DE vs. CBUP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SYBF.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBF.DE) and iShares € Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBUP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYBF.DE achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly higher than CBUP.DE's -0.06% return.


SYBF.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
1.53%
6M
2.91%
YTD
4.40%
1Y
5.50%
3Y*
4.52%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
2.19%

CBUP.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.96%
6M
-0.41%
YTD
-0.06%
1Y
0.60%
3Y*
2.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYBF.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SYBF.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
4.40%-6.20%11.43%1.73%-4.59%
CBUP.DE
iShares € Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-0.06%0.99%2.05%7.83%-11.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SYBF.DE and CBUP.DE is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2022

-0.09

The correlation between SYBF.DE and CBUP.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to -0.07 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYBF.DE vs. CBUP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYBF.DE
SYBF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SYBF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUP.DE
CBUP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CBUP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYBF.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBF.DE) and iShares € Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBUP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SYBF.DECBUP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.03

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

0.19

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.33

0.48

+3.86

SYBF.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYBF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the CBUP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYBF.DE and CBUP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SYBF.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYBF.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.15%, which is greater than CBUP.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYBF.DE and CBUP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYBF.DECBUP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.15%

-12.62%

-15.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.19%

-3.19%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.86%

-3.58%

-7.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.33%

-1.90%

-2.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.91%

-5.07%

-3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

1.26%

0.00%

Volatility

SYBF.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBF.DE) is 1.14%, while iShares € Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBUP.DE) has a volatility of 1.24%. This indicates that SYBF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYBF.DECBUP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

1.24%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.03%

3.66%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.63%

4.18%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.06%

5.87%

+1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.65%

5.87%

+4.78%

SYBF.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SYBF.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CBUP.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SYBF.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Dividend Comparison

SYBF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, while CBUP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBUP.DE
iShares € Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SYBF.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
4.50%5.03%4.10%3.10%1.21%1.74%2.86%2.43%1.68%1.77%1.36%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


SYBF.DE and CBUP.DE have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SYBF.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SYBF.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CBUP.DE.

SYBF.DE tracks Bloomberg US Corporate 0-3, while CBUP.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Green Bond SRI (including Nuclear Power) Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SYBF.DE and 0.20% for CBUP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYBF.DE and CBUP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer