PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYBC.DE vs. SPYM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SYBC.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYBC.DE) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (SPYM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYBC.DE achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM.DE's 21.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SYBC.DE has underperformed SPYM.DE with an annualized return of 0.78%, while SPYM.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.60% annualized return.


SYBC.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.52%
6M
0.07%
YTD
0.57%
1Y
1.43%
3Y*
4.47%
5Y*
-0.15%
10Y*
0.78%

SPYM.DE

1D
-1.39%
1M
-5.08%
6M
12.97%
YTD
21.77%
1Y
38.45%
3Y*
19.46%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
8.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYBC.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SYBC.DE
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.57%3.07%4.28%7.58%-13.73%-1.04%2.62%6.34%-1.54%2.10%
SPYM.DE
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
21.77%19.06%14.05%6.05%-14.90%5.28%6.27%22.31%-11.26%19.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SYBC.DE and SPYM.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2011

0.15

Over the past year, SYBC.DE and SPYM.DE have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYBC.DE vs. SPYM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYBC.DE
SYBC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SYBC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM.DE
SPYM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPYM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYBC.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYBC.DE) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (SPYM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SYBC.DESPYM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.34

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

3.69

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.75

10.99

-9.24

SYBC.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYBC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the SPYM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYBC.DE and SPYM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SYBC.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYBC.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.59%, smaller than the maximum SPYM.DE drawdown of -44.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYBC.DE and SPYM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYBC.DESPYM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.59%

-44.83%

+27.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-10.38%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.68%

-18.95%

+16.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.59%

-23.25%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.59%

-31.69%

+14.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-9.45%

+8.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-17.58%

+14.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

3.49%

-2.67%

Volatility

SYBC.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYBC.DE) is 0.97%, while SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (SPYM.DE) has a volatility of 8.56%. This indicates that SYBC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYBC.DESPYM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.97%

8.56%

-7.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

17.83%

-14.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34%

20.33%

-16.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.42%

17.33%

-12.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.56%

18.53%

-13.97%

SYBC.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SYBC.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYM.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SYBC.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Dividend Comparison

SYBC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, while SPYM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYM.DE
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SYBC.DE
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.26%3.25%3.08%2.13%0.96%0.89%0.86%0.92%0.89%1.21%1.36%1.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


SYBC.DE and SPYM.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SYBC.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SYBC.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for SPYM.DE.

SYBC.DE is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while SPYM.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. SYBC.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond Index, while SPYM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SYBC.DE and 0.18% for SPYM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYBC.DE and SPYM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer