PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYB3.DE vs. EUN9.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SYB3.DE vs. EUN9.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF (SYB3.DE) and iShares Euro Government Bond 5-7yr UCITS ETF (EUN9.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYB3.DE achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly higher than EUN9.DE's -0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, SYB3.DE has outperformed EUN9.DE with an annualized return of 0.18%, while EUN9.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 0.08% annualized return.


SYB3.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.06%
6M
0.13%
1Y
0.77%
3Y*
2.60%
5Y*
0.59%
10Y*
0.18%

EUN9.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
0.50%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
0.41%
3Y*
2.94%
5Y*
-1.15%
10Y*
0.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYB3.DE vs. EUN9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SYB3.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF
0.06%2.26%2.98%3.26%-4.94%-0.83%-0.16%0.22%-0.32%-0.51%
EUN9.DE
iShares Euro Government Bond 5-7yr UCITS ETF
-0.02%2.45%1.87%6.90%-14.78%-1.90%2.71%4.34%0.55%0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SYB3.DE and EUN9.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2011

0.63

The correlation between SYB3.DE and EUN9.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYB3.DE vs. EUN9.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYB3.DE
SYB3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SYB3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYB3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYB3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SYB3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYB3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

EUN9.DE
EUN9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
EUN9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUN9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUN9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
EUN9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUN9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYB3.DE vs. EUN9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF (SYB3.DE) and iShares Euro Government Bond 5-7yr UCITS ETF (EUN9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SYB3.DEEUN9.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.02

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

0.12

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.86

0.33

+1.53

SYB3.DE vs. EUN9.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYB3.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is higher than the EUN9.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYB3.DE and EUN9.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SYB3.DEEUN9.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

0.10

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

-0.21

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

0.02

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.34

+0.21

Drawdowns

SYB3.DE vs. EUN9.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYB3.DE drawdown since its inception was -7.13%, smaller than the maximum EUN9.DE drawdown of -17.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYB3.DE and EUN9.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYB3.DEEUN9.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.13%

-17.43%

+10.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.28%

-3.42%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.28%

-3.42%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.99%

-17.35%

+11.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.13%

-17.43%

+10.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-7.00%

+6.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.39%

-3.80%

+2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

1.23%

-0.82%

Volatility

SYB3.DE vs. EUN9.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF (SYB3.DE) is 0.52%, while iShares Euro Government Bond 5-7yr UCITS ETF (EUN9.DE) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that SYB3.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUN9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYB3.DEEUN9.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.52%

1.57%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.19%

3.45%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34%

3.96%

-2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.67%

5.41%

-3.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.48%

4.32%

-2.84%

SYB3.DE vs. EUN9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SYB3.DE and EUN9.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SYB3.DE vs. EUN9.DE - Dividend Comparison

SYB3.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than EUN9.DE's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUN9.DE
iShares Euro Government Bond 5-7yr UCITS ETF
2.66%2.66%2.53%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.14%0.49%0.35%0.23%0.53%0.36%
SYB3.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year Euro Government Bond UCITS ETF
2.28%1.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.04%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


SYB3.DE and EUN9.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SYB3.DE and EUN9.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

SYB3.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro 1-3 Year Treasury Bond, while EUN9.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Bond 5-7. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYB3.DE and EUN9.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer