PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXRT.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXRT.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SXRT.DE) and HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (H4ZZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SXRT.DE having a 10.55% return and H4ZZ.DE slightly higher at 10.70%.


SXRT.DE

1D
0.20%
1M
0.60%
6M
6.07%
YTD
10.55%
1Y
21.66%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
10.99%

H4ZZ.DE

1D
0.31%
1M
0.70%
6M
6.19%
YTD
10.70%
1Y
21.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXRT.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SXRT.DE
iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
10.55%22.21%-1.33%
H4ZZ.DE
HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
10.70%22.35%-2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SXRT.DE and H4ZZ.DE is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2024

1.00

The correlation between SXRT.DE and H4ZZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXRT.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXRT.DE
SXRT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SXRT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZZ.DE
H4ZZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
H4ZZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXRT.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SXRT.DE) and HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (H4ZZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SXRT.DEH4ZZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

1.99

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.91

6.94

-0.03

SXRT.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXRT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the H4ZZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXRT.DE and H4ZZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SXRT.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXRT.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.41%, which is greater than H4ZZ.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRT.DE and H4ZZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXRT.DEH4ZZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.41%

-16.46%

-21.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-10.94%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-1.90%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-2.62%

-4.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

3.13%

0.00%

Volatility

SXRT.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SXRT.DE) and HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (H4ZZ.DE) have volatilities of 3.95% and 3.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXRT.DEH4ZZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

3.95%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.42%

13.41%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.09%

16.07%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.56%

16.74%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.84%

16.74%

+1.10%

SXRT.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXRT.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZZ.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXRT.DE vs. H4ZZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXRT.DE nor H4ZZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, SXRT.DE and H4ZZ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, H4ZZ.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for SXRT.DE.

SXRT.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50, while H4ZZ.DE tracks EURO STOXX 50. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SXRT.DE and 0.05% for H4ZZ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXRT.DE and H4ZZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer