PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXRP.DE vs. CEMS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXRP.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Euro Government Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRP.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXRP.DE achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than CEMS.DE's 13.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SXRP.DE has underperformed CEMS.DE with an annualized return of 0.07%, while CEMS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.71% annualized return.


SXRP.DE

1D
0.06%
1M
0.41%
YTD
-0.09%
6M
-0.14%
1Y
0.41%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
-0.69%
10Y*
0.07%

CEMS.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
2.64%
YTD
13.72%
6M
16.98%
1Y
32.08%
3Y*
21.63%
5Y*
14.47%
10Y*
10.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXRP.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXRP.DE
iShares Euro Government Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
-0.09%2.47%2.09%5.92%-12.11%-1.59%1.82%2.83%0.15%0.10%
CEMS.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
13.72%35.97%9.93%13.90%-4.54%26.62%-8.86%23.48%-14.04%10.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SXRP.DE and CEMS.DE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2015

0.06

Over the past year, SXRP.DE and CEMS.DE have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXRP.DE vs. CEMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXRP.DE
SXRP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SXRP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMS.DE
CEMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CEMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXRP.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Euro Government Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRP.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXRP.DECEMS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.43

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

3.29

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.41

12.37

-11.96

SXRP.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXRP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the CEMS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXRP.DE and CEMS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXRP.DECEMS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

2.37

-2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.94

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

0.61

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.49

-0.01

Drawdowns

SXRP.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXRP.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.50%, smaller than the maximum CEMS.DE drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRP.DE and CEMS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXRP.DECEMS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.50%

-40.20%

+25.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-9.99%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.84%

-17.57%

+14.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.37%

-19.55%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.50%

-40.20%

+25.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.47%

-1.26%

-3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-7.49%

+4.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

2.66%

-1.66%

Volatility

SXRP.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Euro Government Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRP.DE) is 1.31%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that SXRP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXRP.DECEMS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

4.65%

-3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

11.17%

-8.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09%

13.87%

-10.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.35%

15.23%

-10.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.55%

17.43%

-13.88%

SXRP.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXRP.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXRP.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXRP.DE nor CEMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXRP.DE and CEMS.DE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXRP.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXRP.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEMS.DE.

SXRP.DE is categorized as European Government Bonds, while CEMS.DE is Europe Equities. SXRP.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Bond 3-7, while CEMS.DE tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXRP.DE and 0.25% for CEMS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXRP.DE and CEMS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer