PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SXRM.DE vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SXRM.DE vs. NVDA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SXRM.DE (iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SXRM.DE returned 0.67%/yr vs 67.95%/yr for NVDA. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

SXRM.DE vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRM.DE) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXRM.DE achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SXRM.DE has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 0.67%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 67.95% annualized return.

SXRM.DE

1D
0.38%
1M
0.09%
YTD
-0.59%
6M
0.05%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
2.95%
5Y*
-1.07%
10Y*
0.67%

NVDA

1D
0.16%
1M
-12.86%
YTD
10.16%
6M
17.38%
1Y
44.72%
3Y*
71.13%
5Y*
63.13%
10Y*
67.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXRM.DE vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXRM.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc)		-0.59%8.56%-0.51%3.57%-14.86%-3.03%9.73%9.02%0.39%2.66%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation		10.16%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SXRM.DE and NVDA is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2009

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc)

NVIDIA Corporation

Often compared with SXRM.DE:
SXRM.DE vs. IEFSXRM.DE vs. IUSM.DESXRM.DE vs. SXRH.DESXRM.DE vs. TP05.LSXRM.DE vs. VWRA.LSXRM.DE vs. IBTS.LSXRM.DE vs. IBTM.L
Often compared with NVDA:
NVDA vs. AMDNVDA vs. AAPLNVDA vs. AVGONVDA vs. TSMNVDA vs. SPYNVDA vs. AMZNNVDA vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

SXRM.DE vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SXRM.DE
SXRM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SXRM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXRM.DE vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRM.DE) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

SXRM.DENVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.82
1.20

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.23
1.75

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.21

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

2.07

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.74

4.94

-2.21

SXRM.DE vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXRM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXRM.DE and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SXRM.DE vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXRM.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.31%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRM.DE and NVDA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SXRM.DENVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.31%

-89.72%

+66.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.02%

-20.21%

+16.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.24%

-36.88%

+29.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.90%

-66.34%

+45.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.31%

-66.34%

+43.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.34%

-12.86%

+2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.45%

-36.18%

+29.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

8.46%

-7.09%

Volatility

SXRM.DE vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRM.DE) is 1.86%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that SXRM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SXRM.DENVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.86%

13.26%

-11.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.41%

26.67%

-23.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.60%

35.00%

-30.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.38%

51.76%

-44.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.30%

49.84%

-43.54%

Dividends

SXRM.DE vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

SXRM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation		0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
SXRM.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

SXRM.DE and NVDA have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXRM.DE and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer