PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXRH.DE vs. EUNL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXRH.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SXRH.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXRH.DE achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly lower than EUNL.DE's 10.86% return.


SXRH.DE

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.62%
YTD
2.67%
6M
1.53%
1Y
2.26%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
5.69%
10Y*

EUNL.DE

1D
0.02%
1M
4.80%
YTD
10.86%
6M
11.29%
1Y
23.80%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
12.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXRH.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXRH.DE
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.67%-5.76%14.60%4.61%3.48%14.75%-3.13%10.57%4.53%-8.74%
EUNL.DE
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.86%7.90%25.93%20.13%-13.59%32.71%5.48%31.34%-5.13%3.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SXRH.DE and EUNL.DE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2017

0.16

The correlation between SXRH.DE and EUNL.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (5 years) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXRH.DE vs. EUNL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXRH.DE
SXRH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
SXRH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNL.DE
EUNL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EUNL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXRH.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SXRH.DE) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXRH.DEEUNL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.40

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

3.64

-3.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.37

14.52

-13.14

SXRH.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXRH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the EUNL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXRH.DE and EUNL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXRH.DEEUNL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

2.12

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.90

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.82

-0.31

Drawdowns

SXRH.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXRH.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.17%, smaller than the maximum EUNL.DE drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRH.DE and EUNL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXRH.DEEUNL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.17%

-33.63%

+20.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.74%

-6.50%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

-21.73%

+11.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.14%

-21.73%

+9.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-0.31%

-5.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-4.25%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

1.64%

-0.15%

Volatility

SXRH.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SXRH.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EUNL.DE) at 2.62%. This indicates that SXRH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXRH.DEEUNL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

2.62%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.92%

7.72%

-2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.56%

11.16%

-4.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.19%

14.17%

-5.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.46%

15.17%

-7.71%

SXRH.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXRH.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EUNL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXRH.DE vs. EUNL.DE - Dividend Comparison

SXRH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, while EUNL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUNL.DE
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SXRH.DE
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.13%6.14%9.84%8.76%0.72%0.78%4.65%6.24%2.28%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


SXRH.DE and EUNL.DE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXRH.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXRH.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EUNL.DE.

SXRH.DE is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while EUNL.DE is Global Equities. SXRH.DE tracks ICE US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond 0-5 Years, while EUNL.DE tracks MSCI World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SXRH.DE and 0.20% for EUNL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXRH.DE and EUNL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer