PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXRF.DE vs. IUSQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXRF.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SXRF.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXRF.DE achieves a 3.61% return, which is significantly lower than IUSQ.DE's 14.14% return.


SXRF.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.91%
6M
3.13%
YTD
3.61%
1Y
7.18%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
2.42%
10Y*

IUSQ.DE

1D
0.59%
1M
1.08%
6M
13.65%
YTD
14.14%
1Y
26.53%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
11.85%
10Y*
12.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXRF.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXRF.DE
iShares $ Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.61%-4.30%10.07%2.89%-3.43%7.01%-2.85%12.53%4.12%-8.27%
IUSQ.DE
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)
14.14%9.02%24.53%18.57%-13.58%29.13%4.94%30.14%-5.97%3.14%

Correlation

The correlation between SXRF.DE and IUSQ.DE is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2017

0.16

The correlation between SXRF.DE and IUSQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (5 years) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXRF.DE vs. IUSQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXRF.DE
SXRF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SXRF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSQ.DE
IUSQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IUSQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXRF.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SXRF.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SXRF.DEIUSQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.41

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

4.08

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.97

16.66

-10.69

SXRF.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXRF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the IUSQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXRF.DE and IUSQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SXRF.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXRF.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRF.DE and IUSQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXRF.DEIUSQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.60%

-33.60%

+13.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.17%

-6.48%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.48%

-21.25%

+11.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.49%

-21.25%

+10.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-0.06%

-2.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-4.17%

-2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

1.59%

-0.39%

Volatility

SXRF.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SXRF.DE) is 1.55%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that SXRF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXRF.DEIUSQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

3.66%

-2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.72%

8.63%

-4.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.60%

11.78%

-6.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.10%

13.99%

-6.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.05%

14.98%

-5.93%

SXRF.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXRF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IUSQ.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXRF.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

SXRF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, while IUSQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSQ.DE
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SXRF.DE
iShares $ Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.44%4.55%3.62%2.79%1.94%1.82%3.03%2.91%2.57%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


SXRF.DE and IUSQ.DE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXRF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXRF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.

SXRF.DE is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IUSQ.DE is Global Equities. SXRF.DE tracks Bloomberg US Intermediate Credit Index, while IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXRF.DE and 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXRF.DE and IUSQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer