PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXRF.DE vs. IS3F.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXRF.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SXRF.DE) and iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS3F.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXRF.DE achieves a 3.61% return, which is significantly lower than IS3F.DE's 5.49% return.


SXRF.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.91%
6M
3.13%
YTD
3.61%
1Y
7.18%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
2.42%
10Y*

IS3F.DE

1D
0.34%
1M
1.62%
6M
5.29%
YTD
5.49%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
5.78%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*
4.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXRF.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXRF.DE
iShares $ Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.61%-4.30%10.07%2.89%-3.43%7.01%-2.85%12.53%4.12%-8.27%
IS3F.DE
iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.49%-6.28%14.29%7.35%6.51%9.83%-8.41%13.49%1.81%-6.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SXRF.DE and IS3F.DE is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2017

0.69

The correlation between SXRF.DE and IS3F.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXRF.DE vs. IS3F.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXRF.DE
SXRF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SXRF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3F.DE
IS3F.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IS3F.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXRF.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SXRF.DE) and iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS3F.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SXRF.DEIS3F.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.22

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.76

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.97

7.08

-1.11

SXRF.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXRF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the IS3F.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXRF.DE and IS3F.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SXRF.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXRF.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum IS3F.DE drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRF.DE and IS3F.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXRF.DEIS3F.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.60%

-27.25%

+6.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.17%

-2.93%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.48%

-11.67%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.49%

-11.67%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-3.40%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-8.18%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

1.14%

+0.06%

Volatility

SXRF.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SXRF.DE) is 1.55%, while iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS3F.DE) has a volatility of 1.90%. This indicates that SXRF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3F.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXRF.DEIS3F.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

1.90%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.72%

4.53%

-0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.60%

6.38%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.10%

7.66%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.05%

8.21%

+0.84%

SXRF.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXRF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3F.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXRF.DE vs. IS3F.DE - Dividend Comparison

SXRF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, more than IS3F.DE's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IS3F.DE
iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.25%4.77%5.36%4.95%2.10%1.50%2.62%3.52%2.81%2.25%2.36%3.21%
SXRF.DE
iShares $ Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.44%4.55%3.62%2.79%1.94%1.82%3.03%2.91%2.57%0.47%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SXRF.DE and IS3F.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXRF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXRF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IS3F.DE.

SXRF.DE tracks Bloomberg US Intermediate Credit Index, while IS3F.DE tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Interest Rate Hedged Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXRF.DE and 0.25% for IS3F.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXRF.DE and IS3F.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer