PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXRF.DE vs. FRNU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXRF.DE vs. FRNU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SXRF.DE) and Amundi Floating Rate USD Corporate ESG UCITS ETF USD (FRNU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXRF.DE achieves a 3.61% return, which is significantly lower than FRNU.DE's 5.09% return.


SXRF.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.91%
6M
3.13%
YTD
3.61%
1Y
7.18%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
2.42%
10Y*

FRNU.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
1.86%
6M
4.90%
YTD
5.09%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
4.97%
10Y*
2.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXRF.DE vs. FRNU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXRF.DE
iShares $ Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.61%-4.30%10.07%2.89%-3.43%7.01%-2.85%12.53%4.12%-8.27%
FRNU.DE
Amundi Floating Rate USD Corporate ESG UCITS ETF USD
5.09%-6.54%12.72%2.79%7.34%8.64%-7.76%7.65%4.93%-8.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SXRF.DE and FRNU.DE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2017

0.82

The correlation between SXRF.DE and FRNU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXRF.DE vs. FRNU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXRF.DE
SXRF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SXRF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FRNU.DE
FRNU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FRNU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRNU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRNU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FRNU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRNU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXRF.DE vs. FRNU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SXRF.DE) and Amundi Floating Rate USD Corporate ESG UCITS ETF USD (FRNU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SXRF.DEFRNU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.44

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.97

5.60

+0.37

SXRF.DE vs. FRNU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXRF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the FRNU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXRF.DE and FRNU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SXRF.DE vs. FRNU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXRF.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, which is greater than FRNU.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRF.DE and FRNU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXRF.DEFRNU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.60%

-19.45%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.17%

-3.25%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.48%

-11.41%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.49%

-11.41%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-4.20%

+1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-7.79%

+1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

1.42%

-0.22%

Volatility

SXRF.DE vs. FRNU.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SXRF.DE) is 1.55%, while Amundi Floating Rate USD Corporate ESG UCITS ETF USD (FRNU.DE) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that SXRF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRNU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXRF.DEFRNU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

1.70%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.72%

4.35%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.60%

6.12%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.10%

7.58%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.05%

16.96%

-7.91%

SXRF.DE vs. FRNU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXRF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FRNU.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXRF.DE vs. FRNU.DE - Dividend Comparison

SXRF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, while FRNU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRNU.DE
Amundi Floating Rate USD Corporate ESG UCITS ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SXRF.DE
iShares $ Intermediate Credit Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.44%4.55%3.62%2.79%1.94%1.82%3.03%2.91%2.57%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


SXRF.DE and FRNU.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXRF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXRF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for FRNU.DE.

SXRF.DE tracks Bloomberg US Intermediate Credit Index, while FRNU.DE tracks iBoxx MSCI ESG USD FRN Investment Grade Corporates. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXRF.DE and 0.18% for FRNU.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXRF.DE and FRNU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer