PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXR8.DE vs. ETL2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXR8.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR8.DE) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXR8.DE achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly lower than ETL2.DE's 11.73% return. Over the past 10 years, SXR8.DE has outperformed ETL2.DE with an annualized return of 15.15%, while ETL2.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.32% annualized return.


SXR8.DE

1D
-0.91%
1M
0.26%
YTD
10.86%
6M
11.09%
1Y
24.86%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
15.15%

ETL2.DE

1D
0.43%
1M
-6.25%
YTD
11.73%
6M
13.66%
1Y
23.04%
3Y*
8.87%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*
7.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXR8.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXR8.DE
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.86%4.73%32.32%22.47%-14.31%40.74%6.80%34.49%-1.05%6.67%
ETL2.DE
L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF
11.73%4.89%11.58%-9.47%24.86%46.21%-7.56%10.89%-4.22%-9.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SXR8.DE and ETL2.DE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2010

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between SXR8.DE and ETL2.DE has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXR8.DE vs. ETL2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXR8.DE
SXR8.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SXR8.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXR8.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXR8.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SXR8.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXR8.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

ETL2.DE
ETL2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ETL2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETL2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETL2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ETL2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETL2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXR8.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR8.DE) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SXR8.DEETL2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.28

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

2.48

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.66

8.80

+3.86

SXR8.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXR8.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the ETL2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXR8.DE and ETL2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SXR8.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXR8.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.78%, smaller than the maximum ETL2.DE drawdown of -47.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXR8.DE and ETL2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXR8.DEETL2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.78%

-47.05%

+13.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

-9.25%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.32%

-15.06%

-8.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.32%

-23.24%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

-26.52%

-7.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-8.85%

+7.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

-22.24%

+17.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

2.61%

-0.65%

Volatility

SXR8.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR8.DE) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE) have volatilities of 3.36% and 3.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXR8.DEETL2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

3.35%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.88%

12.90%

-5.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.83%

14.79%

-2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.20%

15.45%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.09%

13.68%

+2.41%

SXR8.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXR8.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ETL2.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SXR8.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXR8.DE nor ETL2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXR8.DE and ETL2.DE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXR8.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXR8.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ETL2.DE.

SXR8.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while ETL2.DE is Commodities. SXR8.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while ETL2.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SXR8.DE and 0.30% for ETL2.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXR8.DE and ETL2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer