PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXR6.DE vs. NQSE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXR6.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Acc (SXR6.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXR6.DE achieves a 3.87% return, which is significantly lower than NQSE.DE's 17.82% return.


SXR6.DE

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.16%
YTD
3.87%
6M
3.94%
1Y
11.34%
3Y*
6.07%
5Y*
4.25%
10Y*

NQSE.DE

1D
-0.77%
1M
6.66%
YTD
17.82%
6M
17.09%
1Y
35.67%
3Y*
25.27%
5Y*
14.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXR6.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SXR6.DE
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Acc
3.87%6.58%9.11%9.64%-13.84%9.84%6.35%26.72%-10.65%
NQSE.DE
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
17.82%18.16%24.07%52.10%-36.29%27.37%45.23%35.67%-15.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SXR6.DE and NQSE.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2018

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXR6.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXR6.DE
SXR6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
SXR6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXR6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXR6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SXR6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXR6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

NQSE.DE
NQSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXR6.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Acc (SXR6.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXR6.DENQSE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.39

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

3.08

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.55

10.77

-8.21

SXR6.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXR6.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXR6.DE and NQSE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXR6.DENQSE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

2.28

-1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.71

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.82

-0.52

Drawdowns

SXR6.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXR6.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.35%, smaller than the maximum NQSE.DE drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXR6.DE and NQSE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXR6.DENQSE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.35%

-37.67%

+10.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-11.87%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.29%

-22.40%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.32%

-37.67%

+16.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-0.84%

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

-8.56%

+1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

3.40%

+0.61%

Volatility

SXR6.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Acc (SXR6.DE) is 3.60%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that SXR6.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXR6.DENQSE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

4.75%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.77%

11.99%

+2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.63%

16.05%

+2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.54%

20.91%

-4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

21.54%

-4.77%

SXR6.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXR6.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

SXR6.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXR6.DE nor NQSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXR6.DE and NQSE.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXR6.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXR6.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for NQSE.DE.

SXR6.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while NQSE.DE is Nasdaq-100. SXR6.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while NQSE.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SXR6.DE and 0.33% for NQSE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXR6.DE and NQSE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer