PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXR2.DE vs. EUNA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXR2.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR2.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXR2.DE achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly higher than EUNA.DE's -0.40% return.


SXR2.DE

1D
0.76%
1M
0.46%
6M
11.04%
YTD
9.88%
1Y
29.57%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
11.98%
10Y*
10.55%

EUNA.DE

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.41%
6M
0.20%
YTD
-0.40%
1Y
0.82%
3Y*
2.34%
5Y*
-1.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXR2.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXR2.DE
iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
9.88%22.31%18.64%10.40%-7.44%35.09%-3.70%30.10%-13.74%1.56%
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.40%2.91%1.48%4.41%-13.52%-2.42%3.86%5.07%-1.20%-0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SXR2.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2017

0.04

The correlation between SXR2.DE and EUNA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXR2.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXR2.DE
SXR2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SXR2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXR2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXR2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SXR2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXR2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNA.DE
EUNA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXR2.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR2.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SXR2.DEEUNA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.04

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.61

0.29

+4.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.67

0.78

+18.89

SXR2.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXR2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXR2.DE and EUNA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SXR2.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXR2.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.76%, which is greater than EUNA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXR2.DE and EUNA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXR2.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.76%

-17.81%

-22.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.38%

-2.80%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.58%

-4.11%

-13.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.62%

-17.04%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-8.53%

+7.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.75%

-6.71%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

1.05%

+0.45%

Volatility

SXR2.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR2.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) at 0.86%. This indicates that SXR2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXR2.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.35%

0.86%

+2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

2.83%

+5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91%

3.73%

+8.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

4.84%

+10.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.83%

4.44%

+12.39%

SXR2.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXR2.DE has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

SXR2.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXR2.DE nor EUNA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXR2.DE and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for SXR2.DE.

SXR2.DE is categorized as Canada Equities, while EUNA.DE is Global Bonds. SXR2.DE tracks MSCI Canada Index, while EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.48% for SXR2.DE and 0.10% for EUNA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXR2.DE and EUNA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer