PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXR0.DE vs. CBUI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXR0.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (SXR0.DE) and iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXR0.DE achieves a 2.15% return, which is significantly lower than CBUI.DE's 20.99% return.


SXR0.DE

1D
0.23%
1M
1.78%
6M
3.00%
YTD
2.15%
1Y
2.76%
3Y*
8.28%
5Y*
4.77%
10Y*

CBUI.DE

1D
0.73%
1M
1.10%
6M
20.12%
YTD
20.99%
1Y
41.88%
3Y*
21.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXR0.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SXR0.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
2.15%7.02%13.29%5.81%-9.67%4.32%
CBUI.DE
iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
20.99%20.99%13.86%15.81%-6.11%7.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SXR0.DE and CBUI.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between SXR0.DE and CBUI.DE has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXR0.DE vs. CBUI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXR0.DE
SXR0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
SXR0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXR0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXR0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SXR0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXR0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUI.DE
CBUI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CBUI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXR0.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (SXR0.DE) and iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SXR0.DECBUI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.56

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

6.62

-6.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.13

25.36

-24.23

SXR0.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXR0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the CBUI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXR0.DE and CBUI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SXR0.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXR0.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.73%, which is greater than CBUI.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXR0.DE and CBUI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXR0.DECBUI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.73%

-19.51%

-8.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.26%

-6.29%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.18%

-19.51%

+10.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-0.12%

-1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-3.18%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

1.65%

+0.79%

Volatility

SXR0.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (SXR0.DE) is 2.35%, while iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUI.DE) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that SXR0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXR0.DECBUI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

3.33%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.77%

9.91%

-4.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.13%

13.05%

-4.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.15%

14.17%

-4.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.61%

14.17%

-2.56%

SXR0.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXR0.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUI.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SXR0.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXR0.DE nor CBUI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXR0.DE and CBUI.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUI.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUI.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SXR0.DE.

SXR0.DE tracks MSCI World Minimum Volatility Index (EUR Hedged), while CBUI.DE tracks MSCI World Value ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SXR0.DE and 0.30% for CBUI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXR0.DE and CBUI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer