SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L
SXLY.L (SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF) and ESIC.L (iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, from State Street and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SXLY.L returned 9.33%/yr vs -2.59%/yr for ESIC.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SXLY.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ESIC.L.
Performance
SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SXLY.L is traded in USD, while ESIC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ESIC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXLY.L achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly higher than ESIC.L's -11.88% return.
SXLY.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
ESIC.L
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- -11.88%
- 6M
- -11.22%
- 1Y
- -3.76%
- 3Y*
- -0.32%
- 5Y*
- -2.59%
- 10Y*
- —
SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXLY.L SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF | -0.37% | 8.34% | 29.22% | 41.53% | -34.41% | 27.96% | 4.32% |
ESIC.L iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | -11.88% | 15.19% | -2.80% | 18.89% | -20.52% | 13.21% | 8.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXLY.L and ESIC.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020 | 0.64 |
The correlation between SXLY.L and ESIC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXLY.L
ESIC.L
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
SXLY.L
ESIC.L
Technology
SXLY.L
ESIC.L
Industrials
SXLY.L
ESIC.L
Basic Materials
SXLY.L
-
ESIC.L
-
Communication Services
SXLY.L
-
ESIC.L
Consumer Defensive
SXLY.L
-
ESIC.L
-
Energy
SXLY.L
-
ESIC.L
-
Financial Services
SXLY.L
-
ESIC.L
-
Healthcare
SXLY.L
-
ESIC.L
-
Real Estate
SXLY.L
-
ESIC.L
-
Utilities
SXLY.L
-
ESIC.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXLY.L
ESIC.L
SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLY.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXLY.L | ESIC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.98 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | -0.20 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.69 | -0.49 | +3.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXLY.L | ESIC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | -0.20 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | -0.11 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.11 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLY.L drawdown since its inception was -37.79%, smaller than the maximum ESIC.L drawdown of -42.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLY.L and ESIC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXLY.L | ESIC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.79% | -42.00% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.06% | -21.24% | +6.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.31% | -22.06% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.79% | -42.00% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.33% | -13.26% | +8.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -12.80% | +4.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.95% | 8.63% | -3.68% |
Volatility
SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLY.L) is 6.13%, while iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIC.L) has a volatility of 6.92%. This indicates that SXLY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXLY.L | ESIC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.13% | 6.92% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.49% | 16.17% | -1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.52% | 20.73% | -2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.52% | 24.00% | -1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 23.47% | -2.37% |
SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXLY.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ESIC.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SXLY.L nor ESIC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SXLY.L and ESIC.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXLY.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXLY.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIC.L.
Both ETFs track Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLY.L and 0.18% for ESIC.L.
Find the right allocation for SXLY.L and ESIC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer