PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLY.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXLY.L is traded in USD, while ESIC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ESIC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXLY.L achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly higher than ESIC.L's -11.88% return.


SXLY.L

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
-0.37%
6M
0.46%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*
13.42%

ESIC.L

1D
0.53%
1M
1.41%
YTD
-11.88%
6M
-11.22%
1Y
-3.76%
3Y*
-0.32%
5Y*
-2.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SXLY.L
SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF
-0.37%8.34%29.22%41.53%-34.41%27.96%4.32%
ESIC.L
iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-11.88%15.19%-2.80%18.89%-20.52%13.21%8.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SXLY.L and ESIC.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020

0.64

The correlation between SXLY.L and ESIC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SXLY.L
ESIC.L

Consumer Cyclical

99.1%
95.6%

Technology

0.8%
2.9%

Industrials

0.1%
0.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

1.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

SXLY.L
99.1%
ESIC.L
95.6%

Technology

SXLY.L
0.8%
ESIC.L
2.9%

Industrials

SXLY.L
0.1%
ESIC.L
0.5%

Basic Materials

SXLY.L

-

ESIC.L

-

Communication Services

SXLY.L

-

ESIC.L
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

SXLY.L

-

ESIC.L

-

Energy

SXLY.L

-

ESIC.L

-

Financial Services

SXLY.L

-

ESIC.L

-

Healthcare

SXLY.L

-

ESIC.L

-

Real Estate

SXLY.L

-

ESIC.L

-

Utilities

SXLY.L

-

ESIC.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXLY.L
SXLY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SXLY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

ESIC.L
ESIC.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ESIC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLY.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXLY.LESIC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.98

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

-0.20

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.69

-0.49

+3.18

SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXLY.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the ESIC.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXLY.L and ESIC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXLY.LESIC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

-0.20

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

-0.11

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.11

+0.50

Drawdowns

SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXLY.L drawdown since its inception was -37.79%, smaller than the maximum ESIC.L drawdown of -42.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLY.L and ESIC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXLY.LESIC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.79%

-42.00%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.06%

-21.24%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.31%

-22.06%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.79%

-42.00%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.33%

-13.26%

+8.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.89%

-12.80%

+4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

8.63%

-3.68%

Volatility

SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Consumer Discretionary Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLY.L) is 6.13%, while iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIC.L) has a volatility of 6.92%. This indicates that SXLY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXLY.LESIC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.13%

6.92%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.49%

16.17%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.52%

20.73%

-2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.52%

24.00%

-1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.10%

23.47%

-2.37%

SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXLY.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ESIC.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXLY.L vs. ESIC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXLY.L nor ESIC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXLY.L and ESIC.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXLY.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXLY.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIC.L.

Both ETFs track Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLY.L and 0.18% for ESIC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXLY.L and ESIC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer