SXLK.AS vs. XLKQ.L
SXLK.AS (SPDR S&P U.S. Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF) and XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - SXLK.AS tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while XLKQ.L tracks the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SXLK.AS returned 22.39%/yr vs 26.44%/yr for XLKQ.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SXLK.AS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKQ.L.
Performance
SXLK.AS vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SXLK.AS is traded in EUR, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SXLK.AS having a 24.56% return and XLKQ.L slightly higher at 24.91%.
SXLK.AS
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- 13.89%
- YTD
- 24.56%
- 6M
- 23.20%
- 1Y
- 49.59%
- 3Y*
- 26.35%
- 5Y*
- 22.39%
- 10Y*
- —
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- 14.20%
- YTD
- 24.91%
- 6M
- 23.54%
- 1Y
- 50.48%
- 3Y*
- 32.98%
- 5Y*
- 26.44%
- 10Y*
- 26.02%
SXLK.AS vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXLK.AS SPDR S&P U.S. Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF | 24.56% | 10.14% | 31.30% | 51.14% | -25.03% | 46.32% | 31.72% | 51.36% | -15.98% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 24.91% | 9.72% | 50.98% | 55.05% | -24.67% | 45.15% | 30.44% | 54.10% | -16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXLK.AS and XLKQ.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2018 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SXLK.AS and XLKQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXLK.AS vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXLK.AS
XLKQ.L
SXLK.AS vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P U.S. Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLK.AS) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXLK.AS | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.41 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 3.18 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.23 | 8.52 | -0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXLK.AS | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 2.55 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 1.16 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 1.23 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
SXLK.AS vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLK.AS drawdown since its inception was -31.37%, roughly equal to the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -30.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLK.AS and XLKQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXLK.AS | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.37% | -30.78% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.83% | -15.78% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.08% | -30.46% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.08% | -30.46% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | -3.01% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.54% | -5.56% | -0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.97% | 5.91% | +0.06% |
Volatility
SXLK.AS vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P U.S. Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLK.AS) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) at 6.61%. This indicates that SXLK.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXLK.AS | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | 6.61% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.71% | 14.55% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.07% | 19.72% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 22.75% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.98% | 22.09% | +0.89% |
SXLK.AS vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXLK.AS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SXLK.AS vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SXLK.AS nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, SXLK.AS and XLKQ.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SXLK.AS.
SXLK.AS tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLK.AS and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.
Find the right allocation for SXLK.AS and XLKQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer