PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXLK.AS vs. BNKS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXLK.AS vs. BNKS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR S&P U.S. Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLK.AS) and iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXLK.AS is traded in EUR, while BNKS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BNKS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXLK.AS achieves a 24.56% return, which is significantly higher than BNKS.L's 4.79% return.


SXLK.AS

1D
-2.32%
1M
13.89%
YTD
24.56%
6M
23.20%
1Y
49.59%
3Y*
26.35%
5Y*
22.39%
10Y*

BNKS.L

1D
3.35%
1M
1.67%
YTD
4.79%
6M
7.79%
1Y
25.75%
3Y*
22.94%
5Y*
5.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXLK.AS vs. BNKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SXLK.AS
SPDR S&P U.S. Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF
24.56%10.14%31.30%51.14%-25.03%46.32%31.72%51.36%-15.98%
BNKS.L
iShares S&P U.S. Banks
4.79%6.16%37.03%-6.62%-13.75%50.16%-19.38%39.12%-23.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SXLK.AS and BNKS.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2018

0.33

The correlation between SXLK.AS and BNKS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXLK.AS vs. BNKS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXLK.AS
SXLK.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SXLK.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLK.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLK.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLK.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLK.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

BNKS.L
BNKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
BNKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BNKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXLK.AS vs. BNKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P U.S. Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLK.AS) and iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXLK.ASBNKS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.21

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

1.69

+1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.23

4.71

+3.52

SXLK.AS vs. BNKS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXLK.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the BNKS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXLK.AS and BNKS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXLK.ASBNKS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

1.21

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.21

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.20

+0.79

Drawdowns

SXLK.AS vs. BNKS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXLK.AS drawdown since its inception was -31.37%, smaller than the maximum BNKS.L drawdown of -49.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLK.AS and BNKS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXLK.ASBNKS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.37%

-49.77%

+18.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.83%

-15.20%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.08%

-32.17%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.08%

-48.32%

+18.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.96%

-3.91%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.54%

-16.56%

+10.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.97%

5.45%

+0.52%

Volatility

SXLK.AS vs. BNKS.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P U.S. Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLK.AS) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L) at 6.09%. This indicates that SXLK.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXLK.ASBNKS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.18%

6.09%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.71%

15.69%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.07%

21.25%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.37%

27.38%

-5.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.98%

31.36%

-8.38%

SXLK.AS vs. BNKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXLK.AS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BNKS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SXLK.AS vs. BNKS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXLK.AS nor BNKS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXLK.AS and BNKS.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXLK.AS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXLK.AS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BNKS.L.

SXLK.AS is categorized as Technology Equities, while BNKS.L is Financials Equities. SXLK.AS tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while BNKS.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLK.AS and 0.35% for BNKS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXLK.AS and BNKS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer