PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXLE.L vs. XLES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXLE.L vs. XLES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) and Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SXLE.L having a 30.51% return and XLES.L slightly higher at 31.08%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SXLE.L having a 9.59% annualized return and XLES.L not far behind at 9.33%.


SXLE.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
30.51%
6M
29.43%
1Y
46.36%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
20.21%
10Y*
9.59%

XLES.L

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
31.08%
6M
29.05%
1Y
45.84%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
20.00%
10Y*
9.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXLE.L vs. XLES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXLE.L
State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF
30.51%9.74%3.75%0.62%62.75%50.77%-31.89%9.19%-18.13%-1.18%
XLES.L
Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
31.08%8.75%3.30%0.37%61.87%52.10%-33.17%10.10%-17.97%-1.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SXLE.L and XLES.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2015

0.99

The correlation between SXLE.L and XLES.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

SXLE.L vs. XLES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SXLE.L
XLES.L

Energy

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

SXLE.L
100.0%
XLES.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

SXLE.L

-

XLES.L

-

Communication Services

SXLE.L

-

XLES.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

SXLE.L

-

XLES.L

-

Consumer Defensive

SXLE.L

-

XLES.L

-

Financial Services

SXLE.L

-

XLES.L

-

Healthcare

SXLE.L

-

XLES.L

-

Industrials

SXLE.L

-

XLES.L

-

Real Estate

SXLE.L

-

XLES.L

-

Technology

SXLE.L

-

XLES.L

-

Utilities

SXLE.L

-

XLES.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXLE.L vs. XLES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXLE.L
SXLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

XLES.L
XLES.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
XLES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XLES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXLE.L vs. XLES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) and Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXLE.LXLES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.36

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.94

10.46

-0.51

SXLE.L vs. XLES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the XLES.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXLE.L and XLES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXLE.LXLES.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.13

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.75

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.33

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.28

+0.07

Drawdowns

SXLE.L vs. XLES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXLE.L drawdown since its inception was -66.60%, smaller than the maximum XLES.L drawdown of -72.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLE.L and XLES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXLE.LXLES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.60%

-72.10%

+5.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.55%

-13.59%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-21.36%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.87%

-28.55%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.60%

-67.55%

+0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.44%

-6.34%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.96%

-20.42%

+6.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

4.37%

+0.28%

Volatility

SXLE.L vs. XLES.L - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) and Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLES.L) have volatilities of 8.15% and 8.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXLE.LXLES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.15%

8.15%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.52%

18.13%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.87%

21.51%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.65%

26.88%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.66%

28.92%

-0.26%

SXLE.L vs. XLES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXLE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLES.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXLE.L vs. XLES.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXLE.L nor XLES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, SXLE.L and XLES.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XLES.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLES.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SXLE.L.

SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while XLES.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLE.L and 0.14% for XLES.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXLE.L and XLES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer