SXLE.L vs. XLES.L
SXLE.L (State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF) and XLES.L (Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Energy Equities funds - SXLE.L tracks the S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index while XLES.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SXLE.L returned 9.59%/yr vs 9.33%/yr for XLES.L. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SXLE.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLES.L.
Performance
SXLE.L vs. XLES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SXLE.L having a 30.51% return and XLES.L slightly higher at 31.08%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SXLE.L having a 9.59% annualized return and XLES.L not far behind at 9.33%.
SXLE.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 30.51%
- 6M
- 29.43%
- 1Y
- 46.36%
- 3Y*
- 17.26%
- 5Y*
- 20.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
XLES.L
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 31.08%
- 6M
- 29.05%
- 1Y
- 45.84%
- 3Y*
- 17.04%
- 5Y*
- 20.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
SXLE.L vs. XLES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXLE.L State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF | 30.51% | 9.74% | 3.75% | 0.62% | 62.75% | 50.77% | -31.89% | 9.19% | -18.13% | -1.18% |
XLES.L Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 31.08% | 8.75% | 3.30% | 0.37% | 61.87% | 52.10% | -33.17% | 10.10% | -17.97% | -1.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXLE.L and XLES.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2015 | 0.99 |
The correlation between SXLE.L and XLES.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
SXLE.L vs. XLES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXLE.L
XLES.L
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
SXLE.L
XLES.L
Basic Materials
SXLE.L
-
XLES.L
-
Communication Services
SXLE.L
-
XLES.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SXLE.L
-
XLES.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SXLE.L
-
XLES.L
-
Financial Services
SXLE.L
-
XLES.L
-
Healthcare
SXLE.L
-
XLES.L
-
Industrials
SXLE.L
-
XLES.L
-
Real Estate
SXLE.L
-
XLES.L
-
Technology
SXLE.L
-
XLES.L
-
Utilities
SXLE.L
-
XLES.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXLE.L vs. XLES.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXLE.L
XLES.L
SXLE.L vs. XLES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) and Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXLE.L | XLES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | 3.36 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.94 | 10.46 | -0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXLE.L | XLES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.13 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.75 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.33 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.28 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
SXLE.L vs. XLES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLE.L drawdown since its inception was -66.60%, smaller than the maximum XLES.L drawdown of -72.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLE.L and XLES.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXLE.L | XLES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.60% | -72.10% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.55% | -13.59% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -21.36% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.87% | -28.55% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.60% | -67.55% | +0.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.44% | -6.34% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.96% | -20.42% | +6.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 4.37% | +0.28% |
Volatility
SXLE.L vs. XLES.L - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) and Invesco Energy S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLES.L) have volatilities of 8.15% and 8.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXLE.L | XLES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 8.15% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.52% | 18.13% | +0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.87% | 21.51% | +0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.65% | 26.88% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.66% | 28.92% | -0.26% |
SXLE.L vs. XLES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXLE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLES.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SXLE.L vs. XLES.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SXLE.L nor XLES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, SXLE.L and XLES.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLES.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLES.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SXLE.L.
SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while XLES.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLE.L and 0.14% for XLES.L.
Find the right allocation for SXLE.L and XLES.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer