SXLE.L vs. RENG.L
SXLE.L (State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF) and RENG.L (L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - SXLE.L tracks the S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index while RENG.L tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SXLE.L returned 20.28%/yr vs 8.53%/yr for RENG.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SXLE.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for RENG.L.
Performance
SXLE.L vs. RENG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SXLE.L is traded in USD, while RENG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RENG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXLE.L achieves a 30.88% return, which is significantly lower than RENG.L's 44.12% return.
SXLE.L
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 30.88%
- 6M
- 30.35%
- 1Y
- 44.50%
- 3Y*
- 17.39%
- 5Y*
- 20.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
RENG.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 7.05%
- YTD
- 44.12%
- 6M
- 44.67%
- 1Y
- 88.11%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- —
SXLE.L vs. RENG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXLE.L State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF | 30.88% | 9.74% | 3.75% | 0.62% | 62.75% | 50.77% | 14.15% |
RENG.L L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF | 44.12% | 50.79% | -14.31% | -8.55% | -8.88% | -7.05% | 23.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXLE.L and RENG.L is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2020 | 0.28 |
The correlation between SXLE.L and RENG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SXLE.L vs. RENG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXLE.L
RENG.L
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
SXLE.L
RENG.L
Basic Materials
SXLE.L
-
RENG.L
-
Communication Services
SXLE.L
-
RENG.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SXLE.L
-
RENG.L
Consumer Defensive
SXLE.L
-
RENG.L
-
Financial Services
SXLE.L
-
RENG.L
-
Healthcare
SXLE.L
-
RENG.L
-
Industrials
SXLE.L
-
RENG.L
Real Estate
SXLE.L
-
RENG.L
-
Technology
SXLE.L
-
RENG.L
Utilities
SXLE.L
-
RENG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXLE.L vs. RENG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXLE.L
RENG.L
SXLE.L vs. RENG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) and L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXLE.L | RENG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.58 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 9.64 | -6.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.59 | 34.14 | -24.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXLE.L | RENG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 3.70 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.35 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.45 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
SXLE.L vs. RENG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLE.L drawdown since its inception was -66.60%, which is greater than RENG.L's maximum drawdown of -48.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLE.L and RENG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXLE.L | RENG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.60% | -48.49% | -18.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.55% | -9.09% | -5.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -33.16% | +12.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.87% | -43.54% | +15.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.18% | -1.95% | -5.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.97% | -24.00% | +10.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.63% | 2.57% | +2.06% |
Volatility
SXLE.L vs. RENG.L - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) and L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENG.L) have volatilities of 8.19% and 8.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXLE.L | RENG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.19% | 8.47% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.52% | 17.38% | +1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.95% | 23.74% | -1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.65% | 24.16% | +2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.66% | 24.53% | +4.13% |
SXLE.L vs. RENG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXLE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RENG.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
SXLE.L vs. RENG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SXLE.L nor RENG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SXLE.L and RENG.L have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXLE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXLE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for RENG.L.
SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while RENG.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLE.L and 0.49% for RENG.L.
Find the right allocation for SXLE.L and RENG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer