PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXLE.L vs. QCLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXLE.L vs. QCLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXLE.L is traded in USD, while QCLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the QCLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXLE.L achieves a 30.51% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN.L's 50.38% return.


SXLE.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
30.51%
6M
29.43%
1Y
46.36%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
20.21%
10Y*
9.59%

QCLN.L

1D
-1.57%
1M
14.07%
YTD
50.38%
6M
47.18%
1Y
115.57%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXLE.L vs. QCLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SXLE.L
State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF
30.51%9.74%3.75%0.62%62.75%39.53%
QCLN.L
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc
50.38%29.15%-19.30%-8.05%-31.46%-18.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SXLE.L and QCLN.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2021

0.26

The correlation between SXLE.L and QCLN.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SXLE.L vs. QCLN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SXLE.L
QCLN.L

Energy

100.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

6.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

2.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

28.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

46.8%

Utilities

-

5.2%

Energy

SXLE.L
100.0%
QCLN.L
0.2%

Basic Materials

SXLE.L

-

QCLN.L
6.4%

Communication Services

SXLE.L

-

QCLN.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

SXLE.L

-

QCLN.L
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

SXLE.L

-

QCLN.L

-

Financial Services

SXLE.L

-

QCLN.L
2.0%

Healthcare

SXLE.L

-

QCLN.L

-

Industrials

SXLE.L

-

QCLN.L
28.6%

Real Estate

SXLE.L

-

QCLN.L

-

Technology

SXLE.L

-

QCLN.L
46.8%

Utilities

SXLE.L

-

QCLN.L
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXLE.L vs. QCLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXLE.L
SXLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

QCLN.L
QCLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QCLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
QCLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXLE.L vs. QCLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXLE.LQCLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.44

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

7.48

-4.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.94

23.36

-13.41

SXLE.L vs. QCLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the QCLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXLE.L and QCLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXLE.LQCLN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

3.28

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.04

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

-0.10

+0.45

Drawdowns

SXLE.L vs. QCLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXLE.L drawdown since its inception was -66.60%, smaller than the maximum QCLN.L drawdown of -72.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLE.L and QCLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXLE.LQCLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.60%

-72.06%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.55%

-15.36%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-57.08%

+36.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.87%

-70.19%

+42.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.44%

-23.33%

+15.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.96%

-44.63%

+30.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

4.93%

-0.28%

Volatility

SXLE.L vs. QCLN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) is 8.15%, while First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.L) has a volatility of 15.02%. This indicates that SXLE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXLE.LQCLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.15%

15.02%

-6.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.52%

25.18%

-6.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.87%

35.09%

-13.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.65%

37.60%

-10.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.66%

38.58%

-9.92%

SXLE.L vs. QCLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXLE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLN.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SXLE.L vs. QCLN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXLE.L nor QCLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXLE.L and QCLN.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXLE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXLE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLN.L.

SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while QCLN.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLE.L and 0.60% for QCLN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXLE.L and QCLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer