SXLE.L vs. GCED.L
SXLE.L (State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF) and GCED.L (Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist) are both Energy Equities funds - SXLE.L tracks the S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index while GCED.L tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SXLE.L returned 20.28%/yr vs -4.33%/yr for GCED.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SXLE.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCED.L.
Performance
SXLE.L vs. GCED.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXLE.L achieves a 30.88% return, which is significantly lower than GCED.L's 37.24% return.
SXLE.L
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 30.88%
- 6M
- 30.35%
- 1Y
- 44.50%
- 3Y*
- 17.39%
- 5Y*
- 20.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
GCED.L
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- YTD
- 37.24%
- 6M
- 40.01%
- 1Y
- 90.71%
- 3Y*
- 8.32%
- 5Y*
- -4.33%
- 10Y*
- —
SXLE.L vs. GCED.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXLE.L State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF | 30.88% | 9.74% | 3.75% | 0.62% | 62.75% | 16.35% |
GCED.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist | 37.24% | 41.92% | -26.55% | -10.54% | -30.72% | -22.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXLE.L and GCED.L is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021 | 0.30 |
The correlation between SXLE.L and GCED.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SXLE.L vs. GCED.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXLE.L
GCED.L
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
SXLE.L
GCED.L
Basic Materials
SXLE.L
-
GCED.L
Communication Services
SXLE.L
-
GCED.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SXLE.L
-
GCED.L
Consumer Defensive
SXLE.L
-
GCED.L
Financial Services
SXLE.L
-
GCED.L
Healthcare
SXLE.L
-
GCED.L
-
Industrials
SXLE.L
-
GCED.L
Real Estate
SXLE.L
-
GCED.L
-
Technology
SXLE.L
-
GCED.L
Utilities
SXLE.L
-
GCED.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXLE.L vs. GCED.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXLE.L
GCED.L
SXLE.L vs. GCED.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) and Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (GCED.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXLE.L | GCED.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.60 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 7.95 | -4.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.59 | 26.76 | -17.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXLE.L | GCED.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 3.95 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | -0.15 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | -0.24 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
SXLE.L vs. GCED.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLE.L drawdown since its inception was -66.60%, smaller than the maximum GCED.L drawdown of -72.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLE.L and GCED.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXLE.L | GCED.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.60% | -72.10% | +5.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.55% | -11.35% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -53.20% | +32.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.87% | -69.88% | +42.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.18% | -31.37% | +24.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.97% | -44.84% | +30.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.63% | 3.38% | +1.25% |
Volatility
SXLE.L vs. GCED.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) is 8.19%, while Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist (GCED.L) has a volatility of 9.32%. This indicates that SXLE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCED.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXLE.L | GCED.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.19% | 9.32% | -1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.52% | 16.02% | +2.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.95% | 22.90% | -0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.65% | 28.32% | -1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.66% | 28.88% | -0.22% |
SXLE.L vs. GCED.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXLE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GCED.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SXLE.L vs. GCED.L - Dividend Comparison
SXLE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GCED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCED.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Dist | 1.51% | 2.09% | 1.43% | 0.68% | 0.09% | 0.20% |
SXLE.L State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SXLE.L and GCED.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXLE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXLE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCED.L.
SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while GCED.L tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLE.L and 0.60% for GCED.L.
Find the right allocation for SXLE.L and GCED.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer