PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXLE.L vs. ANRJ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXLE.L vs. ANRJ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXLE.L is traded in USD, while ANRJ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ANRJ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXLE.L achieves a 30.51% return, which is significantly higher than ANRJ.L's 27.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SXLE.L has underperformed ANRJ.L with an annualized return of 9.59%, while ANRJ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.38% annualized return.


SXLE.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
30.51%
6M
29.43%
1Y
46.36%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
20.21%
10Y*
9.59%

ANRJ.L

1D
-0.68%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
27.22%
6M
26.62%
1Y
64.65%
3Y*
36.50%
5Y*
27.41%
10Y*
15.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXLE.L vs. ANRJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXLE.L
State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF
30.51%9.74%3.75%0.62%62.75%50.77%-31.89%9.19%-18.13%-1.18%
ANRJ.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF
27.22%54.07%8.84%15.58%29.26%25.37%-25.74%8.21%-5.44%20.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SXLE.L and ANRJ.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2015

0.66

The correlation between SXLE.L and ANRJ.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SXLE.L vs. ANRJ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SXLE.L
ANRJ.L

Energy

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

25.7%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

44.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

1.4%

Utilities

-

20.6%

Energy

SXLE.L
100.0%
ANRJ.L

-

Basic Materials

SXLE.L

-

ANRJ.L
25.7%

Communication Services

SXLE.L

-

ANRJ.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

SXLE.L

-

ANRJ.L
7.9%

Consumer Defensive

SXLE.L

-

ANRJ.L

-

Financial Services

SXLE.L

-

ANRJ.L

-

Healthcare

SXLE.L

-

ANRJ.L

-

Industrials

SXLE.L

-

ANRJ.L
44.4%

Real Estate

SXLE.L

-

ANRJ.L

-

Technology

SXLE.L

-

ANRJ.L
1.4%

Utilities

SXLE.L

-

ANRJ.L
20.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXLE.L vs. ANRJ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXLE.L
SXLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

ANRJ.L
ANRJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ANRJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXLE.L vs. ANRJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXLE.LANRJ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.58

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

6.50

-3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.94

22.21

-12.27

SXLE.L vs. ANRJ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the ANRJ.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXLE.L and ANRJ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXLE.LANRJ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

3.60

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

1.16

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.58

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.40

-0.06

Drawdowns

SXLE.L vs. ANRJ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXLE.L drawdown since its inception was -66.60%, which is greater than ANRJ.L's maximum drawdown of -61.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLE.L and ANRJ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXLE.LANRJ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.60%

-61.99%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.55%

-9.90%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-15.08%

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.87%

-24.35%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.60%

-61.99%

-4.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.44%

-4.68%

-2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.96%

-15.47%

+1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

2.90%

+1.75%

Volatility

SXLE.L vs. ANRJ.L - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) at 7.34%. This indicates that SXLE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANRJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXLE.LANRJ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.15%

7.34%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.52%

14.65%

+3.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.87%

17.91%

+3.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.65%

23.64%

+3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.66%

26.52%

+2.14%

SXLE.L vs. ANRJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXLE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ANRJ.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXLE.L vs. ANRJ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXLE.L nor ANRJ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXLE.L and ANRJ.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXLE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXLE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ANRJ.L.

SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while ANRJ.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLE.L and 0.25% for ANRJ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXLE.L and ANRJ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer