SXLB.L vs. XLIP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SXLB.L (SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF) and XLIP.L (Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, from State Street and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SXLB.L returned 9.76%/yr vs 13.30%/yr for XLIP.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SXLB.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLIP.L.

Performance

SXLB.L vs. XLIP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLB.L) and Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SXLB.L is traded in USD, while XLIP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLIP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SXLB.L having a 12.57% return and XLIP.L slightly lower at 12.46%. Over the past 10 years, SXLB.L has underperformed XLIP.L with an annualized return of 9.76%, while XLIP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.30% annualized return.

SXLB.L

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 12.57%
• 6M: 16.76%
• 1Y: 18.30%
• 3Y*: 11.15%
• 5Y*: 5.02%
• 10Y*: 9.76%

XLIP.L

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 1.72%
• YTD: 12.46%
• 6M: 13.90%
• 1Y: 23.16%
• 3Y*: 21.84%
• 5Y*: 12.21%
• 10Y*: 13.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXLB.L vs. XLIP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SXLB.L SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF	12.57%	10.91%	-0.67%	12.37%	-11.86%	26.98%	20.18%	23.16%	-15.68%	23.17%
XLIP.L Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF	12.46%	19.50%	17.29%	17.44%	-5.22%	20.97%	9.42%	29.83%	-14.53%	20.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SXLB.L and XLIP.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2015	0.74

The correlation between SXLB.L and XLIP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SXLB.L vs. XLIP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SXLB.L	XLIP.L
Basic Materials	91.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.5%	1.3%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	96.3%
Real Estate	-	1.1%
Technology	-	1.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SXLB.L vs. XLIP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXLB.L

SXLB.L Risk / Return Rank: 31
SXLB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
SXLB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SXLB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
SXLB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
SXLB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

XLIP.L

XLIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 52
XLIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
XLIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
XLIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 52
XLIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
XLIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXLB.L vs. XLIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLB.L) and Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SXLB.L	XLIP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	1.65	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	2.53	-0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.28	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	2.12	-0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.74	8.34	-3.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SXLB.L vs. XLIP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXLB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the XLIP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXLB.L and XLIP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SXLB.L	XLIP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.11	1.65	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.72	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.70	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.62	-0.16

Drawdowns

SXLB.L vs. XLIP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXLB.L drawdown since its inception was -36.00%, smaller than the maximum XLIP.L drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLB.L and XLIP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SXLB.L	XLIP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.00%	-41.72%	+5.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.40%	-10.85%	-0.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.63%	-19.78%	-2.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.19%	-21.91%	-3.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.00%	-41.72%	+5.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.29%	-1.23%	-2.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.84%	-4.81%	-2.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.85%	2.77%	+1.08%

Volatility

SXLB.L vs. XLIP.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLB.L) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) at 4.55%. This indicates that SXLB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLIP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SXLB.L	XLIP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.04%	4.55%	+1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.37%	11.15%	+2.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.49%	13.96%	+2.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.84%	17.01%	+1.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.58%	19.06%	+0.52%

SXLB.L vs. XLIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXLB.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLIP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SXLB.L vs. XLIP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXLB.L nor XLIP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SXLB.L and XLIP.L in my portfolio?

SXLB.L and XLIP.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SXLB.L or XLIP.L?

On fees, XLIP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SXLB.L or XLIP.L?

XLIP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SXLB.L.

What is the main difference between SXLB.L and XLIP.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLB.L and 0.14% for XLIP.L.