SXLB.L vs. USSC.L
SXLB.L (SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF) and USSC.L (SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SXLB.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while USSC.L is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SXLB.L returned 9.76%/yr vs 11.88%/yr for USSC.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SXLB.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for USSC.L.
Performance
SXLB.L vs. USSC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXLB.L achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly lower than USSC.L's 13.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SXLB.L has underperformed USSC.L with an annualized return of 9.76%, while USSC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.88% annualized return.
SXLB.L
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 16.76%
- 1Y
- 18.30%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
USSC.L
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 14.39%
- 1Y
- 36.72%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.88%
SXLB.L vs. USSC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXLB.L SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF | 12.57% | 10.91% | -0.67% | 12.37% | -11.86% | 26.98% | 20.18% | 23.16% | -15.68% | 23.17% |
USSC.L SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF | 13.75% | 14.73% | 8.33% | 23.17% | -10.14% | 35.22% | 8.76% | 23.19% | -15.30% | 9.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXLB.L and USSC.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2015 | 0.78 |
The correlation between SXLB.L and USSC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
SXLB.L vs. USSC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXLB.L
USSC.L
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
SXLB.L
USSC.L
Consumer Cyclical
SXLB.L
USSC.L
Communication Services
SXLB.L
-
USSC.L
Consumer Defensive
SXLB.L
-
USSC.L
Energy
SXLB.L
-
USSC.L
Financial Services
SXLB.L
-
USSC.L
Healthcare
SXLB.L
-
USSC.L
Industrials
SXLB.L
-
USSC.L
Real Estate
SXLB.L
-
USSC.L
Technology
SXLB.L
-
USSC.L
Utilities
SXLB.L
-
USSC.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXLB.L vs. USSC.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXLB.L
USSC.L
SXLB.L vs. USSC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLB.L) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXLB.L | USSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.39 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 4.50 | -2.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.74 | 14.41 | -9.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXLB.L | USSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 2.29 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.45 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.52 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.45 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
SXLB.L vs. USSC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLB.L drawdown since its inception was -36.00%, smaller than the maximum USSC.L drawdown of -48.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLB.L and USSC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXLB.L | USSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.00% | -48.99% | +12.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.40% | -8.12% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.63% | -27.47% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.19% | -27.47% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.00% | -48.99% | +12.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | 0.00% | -3.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.84% | -7.70% | +0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 2.54% | +1.31% |
Volatility
SXLB.L vs. USSC.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLB.L) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) at 4.10%. This indicates that SXLB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USSC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXLB.L | USSC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 4.10% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.37% | 10.09% | +3.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.49% | 15.95% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 21.62% | -2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 22.81% | -3.23% |
SXLB.L vs. USSC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXLB.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than USSC.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SXLB.L vs. USSC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SXLB.L nor USSC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SXLB.L and USSC.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXLB.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXLB.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for USSC.L.
SXLB.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while USSC.L is Small Cap Value Equities. SXLB.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while USSC.L tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLB.L and 0.30% for USSC.L.
Find the right allocation for SXLB.L and USSC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer