SXLB.L vs. SPY5.L
SXLB.L (SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF) and SPY5.L (State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SXLB.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while SPY5.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SXLB.L returned 9.76%/yr vs 15.36%/yr for SPY5.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SXLB.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY5.L.
Performance
SXLB.L vs. SPY5.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXLB.L achieves a 12.57% return, which is significantly higher than SPY5.L's 10.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SXLB.L has underperformed SPY5.L with an annualized return of 9.76%, while SPY5.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.36% annualized return.
SXLB.L
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 16.76%
- 1Y
- 18.30%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
SPY5.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- 27.83%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.71%
- 10Y*
- 15.36%
SXLB.L vs. SPY5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXLB.L SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF | 12.57% | 10.91% | -0.67% | 12.37% | -11.86% | 26.98% | 20.18% | 23.16% | -15.68% | 23.17% |
SPY5.L State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.31% | 17.43% | 25.36% | 26.64% | -18.68% | 29.28% | 17.52% | 30.85% | -5.09% | 22.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXLB.L and SPY5.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2015 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SXLB.L and SPY5.L has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SXLB.L vs. SPY5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXLB.L
SPY5.L
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
SXLB.L
SPY5.L
Consumer Cyclical
SXLB.L
SPY5.L
Communication Services
SXLB.L
-
SPY5.L
Consumer Defensive
SXLB.L
-
SPY5.L
Energy
SXLB.L
-
SPY5.L
Financial Services
SXLB.L
-
SPY5.L
Healthcare
SXLB.L
-
SPY5.L
Industrials
SXLB.L
-
SPY5.L
Real Estate
SXLB.L
-
SPY5.L
Technology
SXLB.L
-
SPY5.L
Utilities
SXLB.L
-
SPY5.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXLB.L vs. SPY5.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXLB.L
SPY5.L
SXLB.L vs. SPY5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLB.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXLB.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.44 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 3.39 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.74 | 14.64 | -9.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXLB.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 2.39 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.86 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.94 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.95 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
SXLB.L vs. SPY5.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLB.L drawdown since its inception was -36.00%, which is greater than SPY5.L's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLB.L and SPY5.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXLB.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.00% | -33.89% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.40% | -8.18% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.63% | -18.37% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.19% | -24.37% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.00% | -33.89% | -2.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -0.55% | -2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.84% | -3.70% | -3.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 1.90% | +1.95% |
Volatility
SXLB.L vs. SPY5.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLB.L) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L) at 3.17%. This indicates that SXLB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXLB.L | SPY5.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 3.17% | +2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.37% | 8.48% | +4.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.49% | 11.59% | +4.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 15.92% | +2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 16.24% | +3.34% |
SXLB.L vs. SPY5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXLB.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY5.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SXLB.L vs. SPY5.L - Dividend Comparison
SXLB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY5.L State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 0.97% | 1.06% | 1.19% | 1.40% | 0.99% | 1.28% | 1.71% | 2.20% | 2.29% | 1.64% | 1.73% |
SXLB.L SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SXLB.L and SPY5.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPY5.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPY5.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SXLB.L.
SXLB.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SPY5.L is S&P 500. SXLB.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while SPY5.L tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLB.L and 0.09% for SPY5.L.
Find the right allocation for SXLB.L and SPY5.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer