PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWSBX vs. LLDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWSBX vs. LLDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWSBX achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than LLDYX's 0.93% return.


SWSBX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.42%
6M
0.02%
YTD
0.16%
1Y
2.11%
3Y*
4.01%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.85%

LLDYX

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.26%
6M
0.51%
YTD
0.93%
1Y
3.12%
3Y*
5.06%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*
2.65%
ALL TIME*
2.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SWSBX vs. LLDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWSBX
Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund
0.16%6.06%3.42%3.95%-5.89%-1.28%4.47%4.96%1.34%0.85%
LLDYX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
0.93%6.19%5.13%5.41%-5.35%1.07%3.17%5.64%1.47%2.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SWSBX and LLDYX is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2017

0.60

The correlation between SWSBX and LLDYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWSBX vs. LLDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SWSBX
SWSBX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SWSBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWSBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWSBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SWSBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWSBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

LLDYX
LLDYX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
LLDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
LLDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SWSBX vs. LLDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWSBXLLDYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.46

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

2.44

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.86

9.03

-5.17

SWSBX vs. LLDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWSBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the LLDYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWSBX and LLDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWSBX vs. LLDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWSBX drawdown since its inception was -9.06%, smaller than the maximum LLDYX drawdown of -10.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWSBX and LLDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWSBXLLDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.06%

-10.54%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.54%

-1.29%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.79%

-1.29%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.88%

-7.43%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.26%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.78%

-1.19%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

0.35%

+0.20%

Volatility

SWSBX vs. LLDYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund (SWSBX) is 0.50%, while Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) has a volatility of 0.60%. This indicates that SWSBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWSBXLLDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.50%

0.60%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.67%

1.70%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12%

2.28%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.00%

2.77%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.46%

2.60%

-0.14%

SWSBX vs. LLDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWSBX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than LLDYX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWSBX vs. LLDYX - Dividend Comparison

SWSBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than LLDYX's 4.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LLDYX
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund
4.67%5.21%4.73%4.71%2.58%2.52%3.06%3.79%4.11%3.90%4.15%4.15%
SWSBX
Schwab Short-Term Bond Index Fund
3.80%4.09%3.66%2.36%1.11%0.97%1.82%2.41%2.12%1.56%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWSBX and LLDYX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LLDYX has higher volatility (0.60%) compared to SWSBX (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWSBX dropped -9.06% vs LLDYX's -10.54%.

LLDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWSBX and LLDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer