SWRD.MI vs. CSWG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SWRD.MI (SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF) and CSWG.L (Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF) are both exchange-traded funds - SWRD.MI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while CSWG.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Switzerland NR CHF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWRD.MI returned 13.04%/yr vs 7.71%/yr for CSWG.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SWRD.MI charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CSWG.L.

Performance

SWRD.MI vs. CSWG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.MI) and Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF (CSWG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SWRD.MI is traded in EUR, while CSWG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSWG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWRD.MI achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly higher than CSWG.L's 4.64% return.

SWRD.MI

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 4.81%
• YTD: 10.80%
• 6M: 11.33%
• 1Y: 23.90%
• 3Y*: 17.67%
• 5Y*: 13.04%
• 10Y*: —

CSWG.L

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 2.38%
• YTD: 4.64%
• 6M: 7.69%
• 1Y: 12.85%
• 3Y*: 8.89%
• 5Y*: 7.71%
• 10Y*: 9.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWRD.MI vs. CSWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SWRD.MI SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF	10.80%	7.68%	27.15%	20.04%	-13.69%	32.91%	5.96%	6.07%
CSWG.L Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF	4.64%	17.52%	3.69%	10.87%	-12.27%	28.28%	1.22%	7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SWRD.MI and CSWG.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2019	0.39

Return for Risk

SWRD.MI vs. CSWG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWRD.MI

SWRD.MI Risk / Return Rank: 71
SWRD.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
SWRD.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SWRD.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 70
SWRD.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
SWRD.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 77

CSWG.L

CSWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
CSWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
CSWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CSWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 36
CSWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
CSWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWRD.MI vs. CSWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.MI) and Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF (CSWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWRD.MI	CSWG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	1.05	+1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	1.56	+1.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.19	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.69	1.14	+2.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.67	3.63	+11.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWRD.MI vs. CSWG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWRD.MI Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the CSWG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWRD.MI and CSWG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWRD.MI	CSWG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	1.05	+1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	0.64	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.92	-0.10

Drawdowns

SWRD.MI vs. CSWG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWRD.MI drawdown since its inception was -33.74%, which is greater than CSWG.L's maximum drawdown of -23.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWRD.MI and CSWG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWRD.MI	CSWG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.74%	-23.82%	-9.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-11.54%	+5.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.46%	-15.34%	-6.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.46%	-17.56%	-3.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	-3.46%	+3.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.63%	-5.22%	+0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	3.58%	-1.95%

Volatility

SWRD.MI vs. CSWG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.MI) is 2.61%, while Amundi MSCI Switzerland UCITS ETF CHF (CSWG.L) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that SWRD.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWRD.MI	CSWG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.61%	3.86%	-1.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.70%	10.04%	-2.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.05%	12.56%	-1.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.09%	14.42%	-0.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.77%	18.51%	-1.74%

SWRD.MI vs. CSWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWRD.MI has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CSWG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SWRD.MI vs. CSWG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWRD.MI nor CSWG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWRD.MI and CSWG.L in my portfolio?

SWRD.MI and CSWG.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SWRD.MI or CSWG.L?

On fees, SWRD.MI is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SWRD.MI or CSWG.L?

SWRD.MI is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CSWG.L.

What is the main difference between SWRD.MI and CSWG.L?

SWRD.MI is categorized as Global Equities, while CSWG.L is Europe Equities. SWRD.MI tracks MSCI World Index, while CSWG.L tracks MSCI Switzerland NR CHF. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SWRD.MI and 0.25% for CSWG.L.