SWRD.L vs. VPAC.L
SWRD.L (State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF) and VPAC.L (Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD) are both Global Equities funds - SWRD.L tracks the MSCI World Index while VPAC.L tracks the Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWRD.L returned 11.75%/yr vs 3.51%/yr for VPAC.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWRD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for VPAC.L.
Performance
SWRD.L vs. VPAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWRD.L achieves a 10.19% return, which is significantly higher than VPAC.L's 2.04% return.
SWRD.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- YTD
- 10.19%
- 1Y
- 22.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.96%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- —
VPAC.L
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 5.32%
- 3Y*
- 8.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- —
SWRD.L vs. VPAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWRD.L State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF | 10.19% | 21.08% | 19.29% | 24.40% | -17.81% | 22.11% | 15.89% | 14.62% |
VPAC.L Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD | 2.04% | 6.34% | 10.84% | 9.27% | -9.70% | 3.64% | 4.81% | 10.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWRD.L and VPAC.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2019 | 0.55 |
The correlation between SWRD.L and VPAC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWRD.L vs. VPAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
SWRD.L
VPAC.L
SWRD.L vs. VPAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (VPAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWRD.L | VPAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 2.54 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.79 | 9.98 | +0.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWRD.L vs. VPAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, roughly equal to the maximum VPAC.L drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWRD.L and VPAC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWRD.L | VPAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.10% | -34.25% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -2.02% | -6.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.89% | -3.40% | -13.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.54% | -13.89% | -11.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.33% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.95% | -3.14% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 0.52% | +1.52% |
Volatility
SWRD.L vs. VPAC.L - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (VPAC.L) at 0.74%. This indicates that SWRD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWRD.L | VPAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 0.74% | +2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.74% | 2.28% | +7.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.18% | 3.17% | +9.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 5.30% | +10.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 11.00% | +6.17% |
SWRD.L vs. VPAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWRD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than VPAC.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWRD.L vs. VPAC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SWRD.L nor VPAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SWRD.L and VPAC.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWRD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VPAC.L.
SWRD.L tracks MSCI World Index, while VPAC.L tracks Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SWRD.L and 0.50% for VPAC.L.
Find the right allocation for SWRD.L and VPAC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer