PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWRD.L vs. IWFV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWRD.L vs. IWFV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SWRD.L is traded in USD, while IWFV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IWFV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWRD.L achieves a 7.74% return, which is significantly lower than IWFV.L's 33.74% return.


SWRD.L

1D
-0.23%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
7.74%
6M
7.43%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*

IWFV.L

1D
1.98%
1M
1.57%
YTD
33.74%
6M
34.34%
1Y
63.45%
3Y*
29.49%
5Y*
16.72%
10Y*
13.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWRD.L vs. IWFV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SWRD.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF
7.74%21.08%19.29%24.40%-17.81%22.11%15.89%14.62%
IWFV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF
33.74%40.55%5.07%18.98%-9.85%20.49%-4.06%7.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SWRD.L and IWFV.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2019

0.79

The correlation between SWRD.L and IWFV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWRD.L vs. IWFV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SWRD.L
IWFV.L

Technology

31.3%
33.2%

Financial Services

15.1%
14.3%

Industrials

10.9%
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
9.2%

Communication Services

8.9%
8.3%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.8%

Energy

3.8%
3.8%

Basic Materials

3.2%
2.9%

Utilities

2.4%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.7%

Technology

SWRD.L
31.3%
IWFV.L
33.2%

Financial Services

SWRD.L
15.1%
IWFV.L
14.3%

Industrials

SWRD.L
10.9%
IWFV.L
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SWRD.L
9.1%
IWFV.L
9.2%

Communication Services

SWRD.L
8.9%
IWFV.L
8.3%

Healthcare

SWRD.L
8.6%
IWFV.L
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

SWRD.L
4.9%
IWFV.L
4.8%

Energy

SWRD.L
3.8%
IWFV.L
3.8%

Basic Materials

SWRD.L
3.2%
IWFV.L
2.9%

Utilities

SWRD.L
2.4%
IWFV.L
2.4%

Real Estate

SWRD.L
1.7%
IWFV.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWRD.L vs. IWFV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWRD.L
SWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

IWFV.L
IWFV.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IWFV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWRD.L vs. IWFV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWRD.LIWFV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.70

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

7.28

-4.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.95

26.90

-15.95

SWRD.L vs. IWFV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the IWFV.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWRD.L and IWFV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWRD.L vs. IWFV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, smaller than the maximum IWFV.L drawdown of -48.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWRD.L and IWFV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWRD.LIWFV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.10%

-48.50%

+14.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-8.67%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.89%

-18.65%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.54%

-26.74%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

-1.17%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

-19.90%

+14.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

2.35%

-0.32%

Volatility

SWRD.L vs. IWFV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) is 3.81%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that SWRD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWFV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWRD.LIWFV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

5.85%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.61%

13.37%

-3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

15.77%

-3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

20.77%

-5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

19.28%

-2.06%

SWRD.L vs. IWFV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWRD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IWFV.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWRD.L vs. IWFV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWRD.L nor IWFV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SWRD.L and IWFV.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SWRD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWFV.L.

SWRD.L tracks MSCI World Index, while IWFV.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SWRD.L and 0.30% for IWFV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWRD.L and IWFV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer