SWRD.L vs. ENGY.L
SWRD.L (State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF) and ENGY.L (SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while ENGY.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWRD.L returned 11.75%/yr vs 19.65%/yr for ENGY.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SWRD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for ENGY.L.
Performance
SWRD.L vs. ENGY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SWRD.L is traded in USD, while ENGY.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ENGY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWRD.L achieves a 10.19% return, which is significantly lower than ENGY.L's 26.92% return.
SWRD.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- YTD
- 10.19%
- 1Y
- 22.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.96%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- —
ENGY.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 24.13%
- YTD
- 26.92%
- 1Y
- 39.09%
- 3Y*
- 17.16%
- 5Y*
- 19.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
SWRD.L vs. ENGY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWRD.L State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF | 10.19% | 21.08% | 19.29% | 24.40% | -17.81% | 22.11% | 15.89% | 14.62% |
ENGY.L SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF | 26.92% | 29.30% | -10.61% | 11.36% | 30.50% | 26.52% | -25.30% | -2.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWRD.L and ENGY.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2019 | 0.40 |
The correlation between SWRD.L and ENGY.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SWRD.L vs. ENGY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SWRD.L
ENGY.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
SWRD.L
ENGY.L
Financial Services
SWRD.L
ENGY.L
Industrials
SWRD.L
ENGY.L
Consumer Cyclical
SWRD.L
ENGY.L
Communication Services
SWRD.L
ENGY.L
Healthcare
SWRD.L
ENGY.L
Consumer Defensive
SWRD.L
ENGY.L
Energy
SWRD.L
ENGY.L
Basic Materials
SWRD.L
ENGY.L
Utilities
SWRD.L
ENGY.L
Real Estate
SWRD.L
ENGY.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWRD.L vs. ENGY.L — Risk / Return Rank
SWRD.L
ENGY.L
SWRD.L vs. ENGY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWRD.L | ENGY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.29 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 2.04 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.79 | 6.95 | +3.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWRD.L vs. ENGY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, smaller than the maximum ENGY.L drawdown of -61.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWRD.L and ENGY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWRD.L | ENGY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.10% | -61.34% | +27.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -19.08% | +10.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.89% | -24.38% | +7.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.54% | -24.41% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -10.31% | +10.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.95% | -12.18% | +7.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 5.61% | -3.57% |
Volatility
SWRD.L vs. ENGY.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) is 2.90%, while SPDR® MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ENGY.L) has a volatility of 7.96%. This indicates that SWRD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENGY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWRD.L | ENGY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 7.96% | -5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.74% | 20.27% | -10.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.18% | 23.42% | -11.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 25.17% | -9.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 26.94% | -9.77% |
SWRD.L vs. ENGY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWRD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ENGY.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWRD.L vs. ENGY.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SWRD.L nor ENGY.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SWRD.L and ENGY.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWRD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ENGY.L.
SWRD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ENGY.L is Energy Equities. SWRD.L tracks MSCI World Index, while ENGY.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SWRD.L and 0.18% for ENGY.L.
Find the right allocation for SWRD.L and ENGY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer