SWRD.L vs. CSPX.L

Last updated Jun 12, 2026

SWRD.L (State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF) and CSPX.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while CSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWRD.L returned 11.11%/yr vs 12.78%/yr for CSPX.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SWRD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSPX.L.

Performance

SWRD.L vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SWRD.L having a 6.18% return and CSPX.L slightly higher at 6.25%.

SWRD.L

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -0.47%
• YTD: 6.18%
• 6M: 6.78%
• 1Y: 20.66%
• 3Y*: 19.27%
• 5Y*: 11.11%
• 10Y*: —

CSPX.L

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -0.68%
• YTD: 6.25%
• 6M: 6.74%
• 1Y: 21.69%
• 3Y*: 20.45%
• 5Y*: 12.78%
• 10Y*: 14.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWRD.L vs. CSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SWRD.L State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF	6.18%	21.08%	19.29%	24.40%	-17.81%	22.11%	15.89%	14.62%
CSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	6.25%	17.45%	25.25%	26.74%	-18.72%	29.35%	17.62%	16.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SWRD.L and CSPX.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2019	0.97

The correlation between SWRD.L and CSPX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWRD.L vs. CSPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SWRD.L	CSPX.L
Technology	28.3%	38.2%
Financial Services	15.7%	11.1%
Industrials	11.4%	7.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	10.0%
Communication Services	9.2%	10.9%
Healthcare	8.8%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	4.7%
Energy	4.2%	3.2%
Basic Materials	3.3%	1.7%
Utilities	2.7%	2.2%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%

Return for Risk

SWRD.L vs. CSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWRD.L

SWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 64
SWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
SWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

CSPX.L

CSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
CSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
CSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
CSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
CSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
CSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWRD.L vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SWRD.L	CSPX.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.82	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	2.69	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.33	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	2.64	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.25	11.05	-0.80

SWRD.L vs. CSPX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the CSPX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWRD.L and CSPX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SWRD.L vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, roughly equal to the maximum CSPX.L drawdown of -33.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWRD.L and CSPX.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWRD.L	CSPX.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.10%	-33.90%	-0.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.31%	-8.17%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.89%	-18.50%	+1.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.54%	-24.39%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.84%	-4.20%	+0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.00%	-3.72%	-1.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	1.96%	+0.05%

Volatility

SWRD.L vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) have volatilities of 3.46% and 3.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWRD.L	CSPX.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.46%	3.56%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.25%	8.82%	+0.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.97%	11.90%	+0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.54%	16.01%	-0.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.23%	16.21%	+1.02%

SWRD.L vs. CSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWRD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than CSPX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SWRD.L vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWRD.L nor CSPX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWRD.L and CSPX.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, SWRD.L and CSPX.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, SWRD.L or CSPX.L?

On fees, CSPX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SWRD.L or CSPX.L?

CSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SWRD.L.

What is the main difference between SWRD.L and CSPX.L?

SWRD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CSPX.L is S&P 500. SWRD.L tracks MSCI World Index, while CSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SWRD.L and 0.07% for CSPX.L.