PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWQRX vs. URTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWQRX vs. URTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2065 Fund (SWQRX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWQRX achieves a 9.79% return, which is significantly higher than URTRX's 7.26% return.


SWQRX

1D
-1.86%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
9.79%
6M
8.88%
1Y
22.91%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*

URTRX

1D
-0.91%
1M
0.85%
YTD
7.26%
6M
6.69%
1Y
15.51%
3Y*
12.67%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
8.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWQRX vs. URTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SWQRX
Schwab Target 2065 Fund
9.79%20.95%14.36%21.21%-20.23%15.97%
URTRX
USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund
7.26%14.78%8.09%13.98%-13.23%10.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SWQRX and URTRX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2021

0.94

The correlation between SWQRX and URTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWQRX vs. URTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWQRX
SWQRX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SWQRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWQRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWQRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SWQRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWQRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

URTRX
URTRX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
URTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
URTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWQRX vs. URTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2065 Fund (SWQRX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWQRXURTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.40

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

3.10

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.91

13.15

-2.25

SWQRX vs. URTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWQRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the URTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWQRX and URTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWQRX vs. URTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWQRX drawdown since its inception was -28.26%, smaller than the maximum URTRX drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWQRX and URTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWQRXURTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.26%

-34.10%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

-5.29%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.02%

-9.12%

-6.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.26%

-19.52%

-8.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-1.25%

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.61%

-4.14%

-2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

1.24%

+1.01%

Volatility

SWQRX vs. URTRX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2065 Fund (SWQRX) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) at 3.33%. This indicates that SWQRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWQRXURTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

3.33%

+2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.89%

6.49%

+4.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.22%

7.71%

+5.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.08%

9.77%

+6.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.87%

10.34%

+5.53%

SWQRX vs. URTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWQRX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than URTRX's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWQRX vs. URTRX - Dividend Comparison

SWQRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than URTRX's 6.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWQRX
Schwab Target 2065 Fund
2.88%3.16%2.92%3.31%5.00%2.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URTRX
USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund
6.32%6.78%3.16%4.24%9.53%7.66%4.53%11.43%8.54%8.10%4.06%2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SWQRX and URTRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWQRX has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to URTRX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWQRX dropped -28.26% vs URTRX's -34.10%.

URTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWQRX and URTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer