SWP vs. DDTL
SWP (SWP Growth & Income ETF) and DDTL (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - SWP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by SWP Investment Management, while DDTL is a Defined Outcome fund managed by Innovator. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for DDTL.
Performance
SWP vs. DDTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWP achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly higher than DDTL's 4.57% return.
SWP
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- 1Y
- 24.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDTL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 4.57%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SWP vs. DDTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SWP SWP Growth & Income ETF | 6.98% | 10.81% |
DDTL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July | 4.57% | 6.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWP and DDTL is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWP vs. DDTL — Risk / Return Rank
SWP
DDTL
SWP vs. DDTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SWP Growth & Income ETF (SWP) and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July (DDTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWP | DDTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWP | DDTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 2.27 | -1.23 |
Drawdowns
SWP vs. DDTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWP drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, which is greater than DDTL's maximum drawdown of -3.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWP and DDTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWP | DDTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.41% | -3.78% | -12.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.69% | 0.00% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -0.40% | -2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | — | — |
Volatility
SWP vs. DDTL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWP | DDTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.91% | 5.46% | +6.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 5.46% | +9.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.52% | 5.46% | +9.06% |
SWP vs. DDTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DDTL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWP vs. DDTL - Dividend Comparison
SWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, while DDTL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DDTL Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWP SWP Growth & Income ETF | 6.83% | 5.64% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWP and DDTL have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDTL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDTL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for SWP.
SWP has the higher dividend yield at 6.83%, compared with 0.00% for DDTL.
SWP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DDTL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: SWP Investment Management and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for SWP and 0.79% for DDTL.
Find the right allocation for SWP and DDTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer