SWHYX vs. LSMSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Opportunistic Municipal Bond Fund (SWHYX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX).
SWHYX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Mar 30, 2014. LSMSX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Dec 22, 2015.
Performance
SWHYX vs. LSMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SWHYX vs. LSMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWHYX Schwab Opportunistic Municipal Bond Fund | -0.44% | 2.98% | 1.89% | 9.24% | -12.81% | 2.49% | 2.52% |
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | -0.27% | 3.22% | 2.22% | 7.96% | -10.03% | 4.11% | 2.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWHYX achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly lower than LSMSX's -0.27% return.
SWHYX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- -0.44%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 3.56%
- 3Y*
- 3.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.46%
- 10Y*
- —
LSMSX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 3.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.26%
- 5Y*
- 1.12%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SWHYX vs. LSMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWHYX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMSX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SWHYX vs. LSMSX — Risk / Return Rank
SWHYX
LSMSX
SWHYX vs. LSMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Opportunistic Municipal Bond Fund (SWHYX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWHYX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.69 | 0.67 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 0.89 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 0.71 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.20 | 1.98 | +0.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWHYX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | 0.67 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.25 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.58 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between SWHYX and LSMSX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SWHYX vs. LSMSX - Dividend Comparison
SWHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than LSMSX's 3.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWHYX Schwab Opportunistic Municipal Bond Fund | 3.82% | 4.12% | 3.79% | 6.48% | 3.38% | 2.46% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | 3.97% | 3.83% | 4.30% | 3.37% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 2.55% | 2.34% | 0.90% |
Drawdowns
SWHYX vs. LSMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWHYX drawdown since its inception was -17.46%, which is greater than LSMSX's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWHYX and LSMSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWHYX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.46% | -15.00% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.71% | -6.21% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.46% | -15.00% | -2.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.56% | -2.62% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -2.88% | -2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 2.21% | -0.29% |
Volatility
SWHYX vs. LSMSX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Opportunistic Municipal Bond Fund (SWHYX) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) at 1.10%. This indicates that SWHYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SWHYX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 1.10% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.75% | 1.60% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.61% | 5.78% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.60% | 4.44% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.38% | 4.52% | -0.14% |