SWDA.L vs. XDEB.L
SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XDEB.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds - SWDA.L tracks the MSCI World Index while XDEB.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L returned 13.91%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for XDEB.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SWDA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEB.L.
Performance
SWDA.L vs. XDEB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWDA.L achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly higher than XDEB.L's 1.04% return. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L has outperformed XDEB.L with an annualized return of 13.91%, while XDEB.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 27.25%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.91%
XDEB.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 6.61%
- 5Y*
- 6.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
SWDA.L vs. XDEB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.08% | 12.64% | 21.11% | 17.59% | -8.33% | 23.64% | 12.25% | 23.03% | -3.78% | 11.78% |
XDEB.L Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C | 1.04% | 3.40% | 13.01% | 1.49% | 1.23% | 16.00% | -0.96% | 18.55% | 3.44% | 7.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWDA.L and XDEB.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SWDA.L and XDEB.L has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SWDA.L vs. XDEB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SWDA.L
XDEB.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
SWDA.L
XDEB.L
Financial Services
SWDA.L
XDEB.L
Industrials
SWDA.L
XDEB.L
Communication Services
SWDA.L
XDEB.L
Consumer Cyclical
SWDA.L
XDEB.L
Healthcare
SWDA.L
XDEB.L
Consumer Defensive
SWDA.L
XDEB.L
Energy
SWDA.L
XDEB.L
Basic Materials
SWDA.L
XDEB.L
Utilities
SWDA.L
XDEB.L
Real Estate
SWDA.L
XDEB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWDA.L vs. XDEB.L — Risk / Return Rank
SWDA.L
XDEB.L
SWDA.L vs. XDEB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWDA.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.06 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | 0.41 | +3.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.55 | 1.14 | +15.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWDA.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 0.33 | +2.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.66 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 | 0.69 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.78 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
SWDA.L vs. XDEB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.58%, which is greater than XDEB.L's maximum drawdown of -19.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and XDEB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWDA.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.58% | -19.61% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -6.39% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.50% | -8.47% | -10.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.50% | -10.19% | -8.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.58% | -19.61% | -5.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -3.52% | +3.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -3.50% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 2.32% | -0.68% |
Volatility
SWDA.L vs. XDEB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) is 2.52%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that SWDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWDA.L | XDEB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 2.66% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.29% | 5.97% | +1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.19% | 7.97% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.30% | 9.68% | +3.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 11.52% | +2.98% |
SWDA.L vs. XDEB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEB.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWDA.L vs. XDEB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SWDA.L nor XDEB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SWDA.L and XDEB.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEB.L.
SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while XDEB.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.25% for XDEB.L.
Find the right allocation for SWDA.L and XDEB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer