PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWQU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SWDA.L is traded in GBp, while IWQU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWQU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SWDA.L having a 9.95% return and IWQU.L slightly higher at 10.14%. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L has outperformed IWQU.L with an annualized return of 12.77%, while IWQU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.13% annualized return.


SWDA.L

1D
-0.55%
1M
-0.21%
6M
8.73%
YTD
9.95%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
17.79%
5Y*
12.11%
10Y*
12.77%

IWQU.L

1D
-0.62%
1M
-0.17%
6M
8.32%
YTD
10.14%
1Y
19.72%
3Y*
15.66%
5Y*
10.53%
10Y*
12.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
9.95%12.64%21.11%17.59%-8.33%23.64%12.25%23.03%-3.78%11.78%
IWQU.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.14%7.07%19.21%19.60%-9.66%24.87%11.57%24.71%-2.05%12.88%

Correlation

The correlation between SWDA.L and IWQU.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2014

0.89

The correlation between SWDA.L and IWQU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SWDA.L
IWQU.L

Technology

30.5%
31.2%

Financial Services

15.9%
14.7%

Industrials

11.3%
10.3%

Healthcare

9.1%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
9.2%

Communication Services

8.5%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.8%

Energy

3.6%
3.9%

Basic Materials

3.1%
3.4%

Utilities

2.5%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.7%

Technology

SWDA.L
30.5%
IWQU.L
31.2%

Financial Services

SWDA.L
15.9%
IWQU.L
14.7%

Industrials

SWDA.L
11.3%
IWQU.L
10.3%

Healthcare

SWDA.L
9.1%
IWQU.L
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SWDA.L
9.0%
IWQU.L
9.2%

Communication Services

SWDA.L
8.5%
IWQU.L
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

SWDA.L
5.0%
IWQU.L
4.8%

Energy

SWDA.L
3.6%
IWQU.L
3.9%

Basic Materials

SWDA.L
3.1%
IWQU.L
3.4%

Utilities

SWDA.L
2.5%
IWQU.L
2.5%

Real Estate

SWDA.L
1.7%
IWQU.L
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IWQU.L
IWQU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IWQU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWQU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWQU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IWQU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWQU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWQU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWDA.LIWQU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.32

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

2.94

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.47

11.60

+0.87

SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the IWQU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWDA.L and IWQU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -41.70%, which is greater than IWQU.L's maximum drawdown of -24.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and IWQU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWDA.LIWQU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.70%

-24.70%

-17.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

-6.67%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

-18.12%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.50%

-18.12%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.58%

-24.70%

-0.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-1.16%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.44%

-3.65%

-5.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.70%

-0.01%

Volatility

SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) is 2.61%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWQU.L) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that SWDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWQU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWDA.LIWQU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.61%

2.95%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.86%

8.92%

-1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.57%

11.29%

-0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.36%

14.53%

-1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.50%

15.38%

-0.88%

SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IWQU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWDA.L nor IWQU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SWDA.L and IWQU.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IWQU.L.

SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while IWQU.L tracks MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.25% for IWQU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWDA.L and IWQU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer