SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L
SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IWQU.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - SWDA.L tracks the MSCI World Index while IWQU.L tracks the MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L returned 12.77%/yr vs 12.13%/yr for IWQU.L. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SWDA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IWQU.L.
Performance
SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SWDA.L is traded in GBp, while IWQU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWQU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SWDA.L having a 9.95% return and IWQU.L slightly higher at 10.14%. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L has outperformed IWQU.L with an annualized return of 12.77%, while IWQU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.13% annualized return.
SWDA.L
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 8.73%
- YTD
- 9.95%
- 1Y
- 21.07%
- 3Y*
- 17.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
IWQU.L
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- 6M
- 8.32%
- YTD
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- 19.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 10.53%
- 10Y*
- 12.13%
SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.95% | 12.64% | 21.11% | 17.59% | -8.33% | 23.64% | 12.25% | 23.03% | -3.78% | 11.78% |
IWQU.L iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.14% | 7.07% | 19.21% | 19.60% | -9.66% | 24.87% | 11.57% | 24.71% | -2.05% | 12.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWDA.L and IWQU.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2014 | 0.89 |
The correlation between SWDA.L and IWQU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SWDA.L
IWQU.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
SWDA.L
IWQU.L
Financial Services
SWDA.L
IWQU.L
Industrials
SWDA.L
IWQU.L
Healthcare
SWDA.L
IWQU.L
Consumer Cyclical
SWDA.L
IWQU.L
Communication Services
SWDA.L
IWQU.L
Consumer Defensive
SWDA.L
IWQU.L
Energy
SWDA.L
IWQU.L
Basic Materials
SWDA.L
IWQU.L
Utilities
SWDA.L
IWQU.L
Real Estate
SWDA.L
IWQU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SWDA.L
IWQU.L
SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWQU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWDA.L | IWQU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.32 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 2.94 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.47 | 11.60 | +0.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -41.70%, which is greater than IWQU.L's maximum drawdown of -24.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and IWQU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWDA.L | IWQU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.70% | -24.70% | -17.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -6.67% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.50% | -18.12% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.50% | -18.12% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.58% | -24.70% | -0.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -1.16% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.44% | -3.65% | -5.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 1.70% | -0.01% |
Volatility
SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) is 2.61%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWQU.L) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that SWDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWQU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWDA.L | IWQU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 2.95% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.86% | 8.92% | -1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.57% | 11.29% | -0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 14.53% | -1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 15.38% | -0.88% |
SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IWQU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWDA.L vs. IWQU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SWDA.L nor IWQU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SWDA.L and IWQU.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IWQU.L.
SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while IWQU.L tracks MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.25% for IWQU.L.
Find the right allocation for SWDA.L and IWQU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer