PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWDA.L vs. IUES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWDA.L vs. IUES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SWDA.L is traded in GBp, while IUES.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUES.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWDA.L achieves a 9.06% return, which is significantly lower than IUES.L's 28.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L has outperformed IUES.L with an annualized return of 12.62%, while IUES.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.46% annualized return.


SWDA.L

1D
-0.87%
1M
-1.14%
6M
6.84%
YTD
9.06%
1Y
19.85%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
12.62%

IUES.L

1D
0.92%
1M
3.92%
6M
20.52%
YTD
28.60%
1Y
36.00%
3Y*
13.34%
5Y*
22.79%
10Y*
8.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWDA.L vs. IUES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
9.06%12.64%21.11%17.59%-8.33%23.64%12.25%23.03%-3.78%11.78%
IUES.L
iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
28.60%2.08%5.69%-5.63%83.32%53.38%-35.31%4.57%-13.26%-9.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SWDA.L and IUES.L is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015

0.43

The correlation between SWDA.L and IUES.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SWDA.L vs. IUES.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SWDA.L
IUES.L

Technology

30.5%

-

Financial Services

15.9%

-

Industrials

11.3%

-

Healthcare

9.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%

-

Communication Services

8.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.0%

-

Energy

3.6%
100.0%

Basic Materials

3.1%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Technology

SWDA.L
30.5%
IUES.L

-

Financial Services

SWDA.L
15.9%
IUES.L

-

Industrials

SWDA.L
11.3%
IUES.L

-

Healthcare

SWDA.L
9.1%
IUES.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

SWDA.L
9.0%
IUES.L

-

Communication Services

SWDA.L
8.5%
IUES.L

-

Consumer Defensive

SWDA.L
5.0%
IUES.L

-

Energy

SWDA.L
3.6%
IUES.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

SWDA.L
3.1%
IUES.L

-

Utilities

SWDA.L
2.5%
IUES.L

-

Real Estate

SWDA.L
1.7%
IUES.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWDA.L vs. IUES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

IUES.L
IUES.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IUES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IUES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWDA.L vs. IUES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWDA.LIUES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.27

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.06

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.71

5.00

+6.71

SWDA.L vs. IUES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the IUES.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWDA.L and IUES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWDA.L vs. IUES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -41.70%, smaller than the maximum IUES.L drawdown of -62.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and IUES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWDA.LIUES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.70%

-62.43%

+20.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

-17.37%

+10.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

-23.95%

+5.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.50%

-23.95%

+5.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.58%

-62.43%

+36.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-10.71%

+8.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.44%

-15.97%

+6.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

7.18%

-5.49%

Volatility

SWDA.L vs. IUES.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) is 2.66%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUES.L) has a volatility of 7.52%. This indicates that SWDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWDA.LIUES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

7.52%

-4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

20.74%

-12.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.53%

23.77%

-13.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.36%

26.69%

-13.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.50%

28.24%

-13.74%

SWDA.L vs. IUES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IUES.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWDA.L vs. IUES.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWDA.L nor IUES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SWDA.L and IUES.L have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUES.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUES.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SWDA.L.

SWDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IUES.L is Energy Equities. SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while IUES.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.15% for IUES.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWDA.L and IUES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer