PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWDA.L vs. ISPA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWDA.L vs. ISPA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SWDA.L is traded in GBp, while ISPA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ISPA.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWDA.L achieves a 9.33% return, which is significantly lower than ISPA.DE's 15.03% return. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L has outperformed ISPA.DE with an annualized return of 12.56%, while ISPA.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.84% annualized return.


SWDA.L

1D
0.25%
1M
-1.61%
6M
8.59%
YTD
9.33%
1Y
20.19%
3Y*
16.57%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
12.56%
ALL TIME*
9.05%

ISPA.DE

1D
-0.37%
1M
1.38%
6M
12.96%
YTD
15.03%
1Y
29.91%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
8.84%
ALL TIME*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWDA.L vs. ISPA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
9.33%12.64%21.11%17.59%-8.33%23.64%12.25%23.03%-3.78%11.78%
ISPA.DE
iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE)
15.03%25.95%8.04%2.69%3.46%14.14%-3.99%17.77%-5.66%7.37%

Correlation

The correlation between SWDA.L and ISPA.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2009

0.72

The correlation between SWDA.L and ISPA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWDA.L vs. ISPA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

ISPA.DE
ISPA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ISPA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWDA.L vs. ISPA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWDA.LISPA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.63

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

6.62

-3.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.89

24.11

-12.22

SWDA.L vs. ISPA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the ISPA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWDA.L and ISPA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWDA.L vs. ISPA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -41.70%, which is greater than ISPA.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and ISPA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWDA.LISPA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.70%

-32.65%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

-4.50%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

-12.88%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.50%

-15.30%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.58%

-32.65%

+7.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-0.37%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.44%

-4.25%

-5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.24%

+0.45%

Volatility

SWDA.L vs. ISPA.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE) at 2.04%. This indicates that SWDA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISPA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWDA.LISPA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

2.04%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

6.63%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

8.60%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.33%

11.64%

+1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.51%

14.36%

+0.15%

SWDA.L vs. ISPA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ISPA.DE's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWDA.L vs. ISPA.DE - Dividend Comparison

SWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISPA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISPA.DE
iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE)
3.92%4.52%4.89%5.91%4.87%3.31%4.04%4.02%4.01%5.66%3.64%4.35%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWDA.L and ISPA.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for ISPA.DE.

SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while ISPA.DE tracks STOXX Global Select Dividend 100. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.46% for ISPA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWDA.L and ISPA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer