PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWDA.L vs. IS3R.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWDA.L vs. IS3R.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3R.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SWDA.L is traded in GBp, while IS3R.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IS3R.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWDA.L achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly lower than IS3R.DE's 22.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L has underperformed IS3R.DE with an annualized return of 13.92%, while IS3R.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 16.39% annualized return.


SWDA.L

1D
1.55%
1M
1.62%
YTD
8.84%
6M
9.32%
1Y
24.97%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
13.92%

IS3R.DE

1D
3.43%
1M
4.60%
YTD
22.40%
6M
24.07%
1Y
37.19%
3Y*
26.29%
5Y*
14.91%
10Y*
16.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWDA.L vs. IS3R.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
8.84%12.64%21.11%17.59%-8.33%23.64%12.25%23.03%-3.78%11.78%
IS3R.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
22.40%14.01%31.94%5.94%-8.87%15.73%22.99%24.62%1.70%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SWDA.L and IS3R.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2014

0.81

The correlation between SWDA.L and IS3R.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWDA.L vs. IS3R.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3R.DE
IS3R.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IS3R.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3R.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3R.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3R.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3R.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWDA.L vs. IS3R.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3R.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWDA.LIS3R.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.39

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

4.22

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.90

15.60

-0.70

SWDA.L vs. IS3R.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the IS3R.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWDA.L and IS3R.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWDA.L vs. IS3R.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -41.70%, which is greater than IS3R.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and IS3R.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWDA.LIS3R.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.70%

-24.85%

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

-8.77%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

-21.22%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.50%

-21.22%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.58%

-23.02%

-2.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-0.19%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.49%

-6.73%

-2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

2.38%

-0.71%

Volatility

SWDA.L vs. IS3R.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) is 3.28%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3R.DE) has a volatility of 6.93%. This indicates that SWDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3R.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWDA.LIS3R.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

6.93%

-3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.65%

14.83%

-7.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.47%

17.28%

-6.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.34%

17.00%

-3.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.58%

18.10%

-3.52%

SWDA.L vs. IS3R.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3R.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWDA.L vs. IS3R.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SWDA.L nor IS3R.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SWDA.L and IS3R.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IS3R.DE.

SWDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IS3R.DE is Momentum. SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while IS3R.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.25% for IS3R.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWDA.L and IS3R.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer