SWDA.L vs. ICOM.L
SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and ICOM.L (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while ICOM.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity (Total Return Index). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SWDA.L returned 13.06%/yr vs 12.26%/yr for ICOM.L. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SWDA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ICOM.L.
Performance
SWDA.L vs. ICOM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SWDA.L is traded in GBp, while ICOM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICOM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWDA.L achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than ICOM.L's 25.24% return.
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 27.25%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.91%
ICOM.L
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- 25.24%
- 6M
- 23.33%
- 1Y
- 38.99%
- 3Y*
- 12.76%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- —
SWDA.L vs. ICOM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.08% | 12.64% | 21.11% | 17.59% | -8.33% | 23.64% | 12.25% | 23.03% | -3.78% | 4.96% |
ICOM.L iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 25.24% | 8.16% | 6.90% | -12.66% | 28.48% | 28.25% | -6.57% | 2.69% | -4.87% | 2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWDA.L and ICOM.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2017 | 0.25 |
The correlation between SWDA.L and ICOM.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SWDA.L vs. ICOM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SWDA.L
ICOM.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Technology
SWDA.L
ICOM.L
Financial Services
SWDA.L
ICOM.L
Industrials
SWDA.L
ICOM.L
-
Communication Services
SWDA.L
ICOM.L
Consumer Cyclical
SWDA.L
ICOM.L
Healthcare
SWDA.L
ICOM.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SWDA.L
ICOM.L
Energy
SWDA.L
ICOM.L
-
Basic Materials
SWDA.L
ICOM.L
Utilities
SWDA.L
ICOM.L
-
Real Estate
SWDA.L
ICOM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWDA.L vs. ICOM.L — Risk / Return Rank
SWDA.L
ICOM.L
SWDA.L vs. ICOM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWDA.L | ICOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.39 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | 5.21 | -1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.55 | 12.08 | +4.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWDA.L | ICOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 2.12 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.73 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.52 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
SWDA.L vs. ICOM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.58%, smaller than the maximum ICOM.L drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and ICOM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWDA.L | ICOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.58% | -28.82% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -7.45% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.50% | -14.48% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.50% | -28.82% | +10.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -4.74% | +4.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -12.30% | +8.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 3.22% | -1.58% |
Volatility
SWDA.L vs. ICOM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) is 2.52%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ICOM.L) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that SWDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWDA.L | ICOM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 5.49% | -2.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.29% | 15.96% | -8.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.19% | 18.28% | -8.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.30% | 16.73% | -3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 15.71% | -1.21% |
SWDA.L vs. ICOM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ICOM.L's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWDA.L vs. ICOM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SWDA.L nor ICOM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SWDA.L and ICOM.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICOM.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICOM.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SWDA.L.
SWDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ICOM.L is Commodities. SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while ICOM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity (Total Return Index). Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.19% for ICOM.L.
Find the right allocation for SWDA.L and ICOM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer