SWDA.L vs. EYED.L
SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and EYED.L (iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while EYED.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SWDA.L returned 18.37%/yr vs 14.57%/yr for EYED.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SWDA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EYED.L.
Performance
SWDA.L vs. EYED.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SWDA.L is traded in GBp, while EYED.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EYED.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWDA.L achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly lower than EYED.L's 21.13% return.
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 10.44%
- 6M
- 10.65%
- 1Y
- 26.63%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.49%
- 10Y*
- 13.71%
EYED.L
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- -9.75%
- YTD
- 21.13%
- 6M
- 22.46%
- 1Y
- 37.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SWDA.L vs. EYED.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.44% | 12.64% | 21.11% | 17.59% | -2.74% |
EYED.L iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 21.13% | 20.21% | -10.08% | 6.02% | 5.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWDA.L and EYED.L is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022 | 0.20 |
The correlation between SWDA.L and EYED.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SWDA.L vs. EYED.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SWDA.L
EYED.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SWDA.L
EYED.L
-
Financial Services
SWDA.L
EYED.L
-
Industrials
SWDA.L
EYED.L
-
Healthcare
SWDA.L
EYED.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SWDA.L
EYED.L
-
Communication Services
SWDA.L
EYED.L
Consumer Defensive
SWDA.L
EYED.L
-
Energy
SWDA.L
EYED.L
Basic Materials
SWDA.L
EYED.L
-
Utilities
SWDA.L
EYED.L
-
Real Estate
SWDA.L
EYED.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWDA.L vs. EYED.L — Risk / Return Rank
SWDA.L
EYED.L
SWDA.L vs. EYED.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EYED.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWDA.L | EYED.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.30 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | 2.24 | +1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.89 | 7.71 | +8.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWDA.L vs. EYED.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -41.70%, which is greater than EYED.L's maximum drawdown of -25.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and EYED.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWDA.L | EYED.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.70% | -25.29% | -16.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -16.59% | +10.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.50% | -25.29% | +6.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -16.59% | +15.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.47% | -8.30% | -1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 4.83% | -3.16% |
Volatility
SWDA.L vs. EYED.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) is 3.12%, while iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EYED.L) has a volatility of 8.39%. This indicates that SWDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EYED.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWDA.L | EYED.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 8.39% | -5.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.70% | 20.00% | -12.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.50% | 23.01% | -12.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 21.27% | -7.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 21.27% | -6.74% |
SWDA.L vs. EYED.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than EYED.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWDA.L vs. EYED.L - Dividend Comparison
SWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EYED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EYED.L iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 4.29% | 5.09% | 5.79% | 5.09% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWDA.L and EYED.L have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EYED.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EYED.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SWDA.L.
SWDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while EYED.L is Energy Equities. SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while EYED.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.18% for EYED.L.
Find the right allocation for SWDA.L and EYED.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer