SWDA.L vs. DBXQ.DE
SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and DBXQ.DE (Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while DBXQ.DE is a European Government Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx® EUR Eurozone 3-5. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L returned 13.92%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for DBXQ.DE. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SWDA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for DBXQ.DE.
Performance
SWDA.L vs. DBXQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SWDA.L is traded in GBp, while DBXQ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the DBXQ.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWDA.L achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly higher than DBXQ.DE's -0.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SWDA.L has outperformed DBXQ.DE with an annualized return of 13.92%, while DBXQ.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 1.08% annualized return.
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 9.32%
- 1Y
- 25.52%
- 3Y*
- 17.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.92%
DBXQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- -0.89%
- 6M
- -1.52%
- 1Y
- 2.16%
- 3Y*
- 3.23%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- 1.08%
SWDA.L vs. DBXQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 8.84% | 12.64% | 21.11% | 17.59% | -8.33% | 23.64% | 12.25% | 23.03% | -3.78% | 11.78% |
DBXQ.DE Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF | -0.89% | 7.90% | -2.23% | 3.39% | -5.20% | -8.33% | 7.29% | -2.77% | 1.35% | 4.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWDA.L and DBXQ.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2009 | 0.19 |
The correlation between SWDA.L and DBXQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (5 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWDA.L vs. DBXQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SWDA.L
DBXQ.DE
SWDA.L vs. DBXQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) and Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF (DBXQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWDA.L | DBXQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.08 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 0.54 | +3.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.90 | 1.23 | +13.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWDA.L vs. DBXQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -41.70%, which is greater than DBXQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWDA.L and DBXQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWDA.L | DBXQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.70% | -17.51% | -24.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.55% | -3.68% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.50% | -4.57% | -13.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.50% | -12.10% | -6.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.58% | -17.51% | -8.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -7.70% | +6.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.49% | -6.64% | -2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 1.62% | +0.05% |
Volatility
SWDA.L vs. DBXQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF (DBXQ.DE) at 1.11%. This indicates that SWDA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBXQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWDA.L | DBXQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 1.11% | +2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.65% | 3.42% | +4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 4.69% | +5.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.34% | 5.81% | +7.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.58% | 7.38% | +7.20% |
SWDA.L vs. DBXQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DBXQ.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWDA.L vs. DBXQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SWDA.L nor DBXQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SWDA.L and DBXQ.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBXQ.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBXQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SWDA.L.
SWDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while DBXQ.DE is European Government Bonds. SWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while DBXQ.DE tracks Markit iBoxx® EUR Eurozone 3-5. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SWDA.L and 0.15% for DBXQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for SWDA.L and DBXQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer