PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWANX vs. VFSUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWANX vs. VFSUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Core Equity Fund™ (SWANX) and Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral Shares (VFSUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWANX achieves a 6.28% return, which is significantly higher than VFSUX's 0.82% return. Over the past 10 years, SWANX has outperformed VFSUX with an annualized return of 12.30%, while VFSUX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.64% annualized return.


SWANX

1D
-0.30%
1M
3.81%
YTD
6.28%
6M
-0.49%
1Y
12.62%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
12.30%

VFSUX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.82%
6M
1.11%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
5.63%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
2.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWANX vs. VFSUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWANX
Schwab Core Equity Fund™
6.28%6.61%25.42%22.83%-18.00%27.27%11.95%29.50%-9.53%24.26%
VFSUX
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral Shares
0.82%6.87%5.08%6.17%-5.75%-0.62%5.26%5.85%0.98%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SWANX and VFSUX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2001

-0.12

The correlation between SWANX and VFSUX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SWANX vs. VFSUX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SWANX
VFSUX

Technology

40.0%
0.1%

Communication Services

11.9%
100.0%

Healthcare

8.9%
100.0%

Industrials

8.3%

-

Financial Services

8.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%

-

Energy

4.6%

-

Utilities

4.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.1%

-

Basic Materials

1.4%

-

Real Estate

0.5%
0.0%

Technology

SWANX
40.0%
VFSUX
0.1%

Communication Services

SWANX
11.9%
VFSUX
100.0%

Healthcare

SWANX
8.9%
VFSUX
100.0%

Industrials

SWANX
8.3%
VFSUX

-

Financial Services

SWANX
8.3%
VFSUX

-

Consumer Cyclical

SWANX
7.5%
VFSUX

-

Energy

SWANX
4.6%
VFSUX

-

Utilities

SWANX
4.5%
VFSUX

-

Consumer Defensive

SWANX
4.1%
VFSUX

-

Basic Materials

SWANX
1.4%
VFSUX

-

Real Estate

SWANX
0.5%
VFSUX
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWANX vs. VFSUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWANX
SWANX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SWANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWANX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SWANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWANX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

VFSUX
VFSUX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VFSUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFSUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFSUX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VFSUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFSUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWANX vs. VFSUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Core Equity Fund™ (SWANX) and Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral Shares (VFSUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWANXVFSUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.47

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

2.83

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.48

11.18

-8.70

SWANX vs. VFSUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWANX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the VFSUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWANX and VFSUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWANXVFSUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

2.08

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.81

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

1.06

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

1.35

-0.87

Drawdowns

SWANX vs. VFSUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWANX drawdown since its inception was -51.33%, which is greater than VFSUX's maximum drawdown of -9.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWANX and VFSUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWANXVFSUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.33%

-9.24%

-42.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.58%

-1.71%

-13.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.43%

-1.71%

-16.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.72%

-9.24%

-14.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.66%

-9.24%

-25.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-0.23%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.29%

-0.87%

-10.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.34%

0.43%

+4.91%

Volatility

SWANX vs. VFSUX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Core Equity Fund™ (SWANX) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral Shares (VFSUX) at 0.75%. This indicates that SWANX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFSUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWANXVFSUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

0.75%

+2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.77%

1.66%

+10.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

2.33%

+11.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.98%

2.99%

+13.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.13%

2.49%

+15.64%

SWANX vs. VFSUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWANX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than VFSUX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWANX vs. VFSUX - Dividend Comparison

SWANX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFSUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWANX
Schwab Core Equity Fund™
0.00%0.00%8.37%2.89%16.55%28.81%4.67%2.88%15.23%11.59%1.66%17.05%
VFSUX
Vanguard Short-Term Investment-Grade Fund Admiral Shares
4.72%4.59%4.16%3.14%2.03%1.79%2.34%2.92%2.79%2.11%2.14%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWANX and VFSUX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWANX has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to VFSUX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWANX dropped -51.33% vs VFSUX's -9.24%.

VFSUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWANX and VFSUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer