PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWAN vs. TACK
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SWAN vs. TACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SWAN vs. TACK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SWAN
Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF
-3.58%13.93%13.44%12.07%-19.91%
TACK
Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund
1.74%10.93%11.76%7.43%-5.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWAN achieves a -3.58% return, which is significantly lower than TACK's 1.74% return.


SWAN

1D
1.86%
1M
-5.08%
YTD
-3.58%
6M
-2.03%
1Y
11.49%
3Y*
9.86%
5Y*
2.53%
10Y*

TACK

1D
1.80%
1M
-4.15%
YTD
1.74%
6M
1.90%
1Y
13.24%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SWAN vs. TACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWAN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TACK's 0.76% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SWAN vs. TACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWAN
SWAN Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SWAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWAN Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SWAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWAN Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

TACK
TACK Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
TACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TACK Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
TACK Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWAN vs. TACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWANTACKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

1.01

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

1.50

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.21

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.49

+0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.45

7.15

-0.70

SWAN vs. TACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the TACK Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWAN and TACK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWANTACKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.01

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.57

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between SWAN and TACK is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SWAN vs. TACK - Dividend Comparison

SWAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than TACK's 1.25% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SWAN
Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF
3.04%2.86%2.54%2.98%2.12%5.04%1.64%3.69%0.29%
TACK
Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund
1.25%1.18%1.26%1.29%0.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SWAN vs. TACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWAN drawdown since its inception was -31.04%, which is greater than TACK's maximum drawdown of -14.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWAN and TACK.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SWANTACKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.04%

-14.49%

-16.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-9.74%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.18%

-4.15%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.07%

-4.31%

-4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

2.02%

-0.19%

Volatility

SWAN vs. TACK - Volatility Comparison

Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK) have volatilities of 4.11% and 4.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SWANTACKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

4.13%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

7.47%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.77%

13.25%

-3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.27%

11.33%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.50%

11.33%

+1.17%