SWAN vs. AVMA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SWAN (Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF) and AVMA (Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. SWAN is passively managed, while AVMA is actively managed. Over the past year, SWAN returned 17.67% vs 23.97% for AVMA. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SWAN charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for AVMA.

Performance

SWAN vs. AVMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWAN achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than AVMA's 10.43% return.

SWAN

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 3.71%
• YTD: 5.21%
• 6M: 4.34%
• 1Y: 17.67%
• 3Y*: 12.85%
• 5Y*: 3.38%
• 10Y*: —

AVMA

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 2.85%
• YTD: 10.43%
• 6M: 11.18%
• 1Y: 23.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWAN vs. AVMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF	5.21%	13.93%	13.44%	5.81%
AVMA Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF	10.43%	16.72%	10.01%	8.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SWAN and AVMA is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.83

The correlation between SWAN and AVMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWAN vs. AVMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SWAN	AVMA
Technology	35.6%	19.2%
Financial Services	11.8%	18.0%
Communication Services	11.2%	6.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	12.0%
Healthcare	8.5%	6.0%
Industrials	8.3%	13.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.8%
Energy	3.5%	8.9%
Utilities	2.4%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.9%	3.3%
Basic Materials	1.8%	5.3%

Return for Risk

SWAN vs. AVMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWAN

SWAN Risk / Return Rank: 54
SWAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SWAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SWAN Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SWAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
SWAN Martin Ratio Rank: 56

AVMA

AVMA Risk / Return Rank: 80
AVMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
AVMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
AVMA Omega Ratio Rank: 82
AVMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
AVMA Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWAN vs. AVMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) and Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWAN	AVMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.68	-0.79
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	3.84	-1.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.50	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	3.76	-1.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.93	15.96	-6.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWAN vs. AVMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the AVMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWAN and AVMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWAN	AVMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	2.68	-0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	1.54	-0.96

Drawdowns

SWAN vs. AVMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWAN drawdown since its inception was -31.04%, which is greater than AVMA's maximum drawdown of -11.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWAN and AVMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWAN	AVMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.04%	-11.81%	-19.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.05%	-6.40%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-0.44%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.88%	-1.55%	-7.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	1.51%	+0.27%

Volatility

SWAN vs. AVMA - Volatility Comparison

Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF (SWAN) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA) at 2.63%. This indicates that SWAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWAN	AVMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	2.63%	+0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.28%	7.08%	+0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.39%	8.99%	+0.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.33%	10.29%	+1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.47%	10.29%	+2.18%

SWAN vs. AVMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWAN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AVMA's 0.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

SWAN vs. AVMA - Dividend Comparison

SWAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than AVMA's 2.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AVMA Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF	2.34%	2.21%	2.28%	1.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SWAN Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF	2.79%	2.86%	2.54%	2.98%	2.12%	5.04%	1.64%	3.69%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWAN and AVMA in my portfolio?

SWAN and AVMA have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWAN or AVMA?

SWAN has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to AVMA (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWAN dropped -31.04% vs AVMA's -11.81%.

Which ETF is better, SWAN or AVMA?

On 1-year performance, AVMA leads with 23.97% vs 17.67% for SWAN. On fees, AVMA is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, AVMA has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SWAN or AVMA?

Over the 1-year period, AVMA has performed better with a 23.97% return vs 17.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SWAN or AVMA?

AVMA is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SWAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SWAN or AVMA?

SWAN has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 2.34% for AVMA.

What is the main difference between SWAN and AVMA?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SWAN and 0.21% for AVMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.