PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWAGX vs. VTBNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWAGX vs. VTBNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWAGX achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly higher than VTBNX's 0.01% return.


SWAGX

1D
-0.34%
1M
0.47%
YTD
0.05%
6M
0.40%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
-0.17%
10Y*

VTBNX

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.01%
6M
0.45%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
1.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWAGX vs. VTBNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWAGX
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund
0.05%7.11%1.38%5.46%-13.62%-2.29%7.39%8.64%-0.11%2.62%
VTBNX
Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund
0.01%7.18%1.32%5.68%-13.12%-1.82%7.39%8.71%-0.27%3.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SWAGX and VTBNX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2017

0.95

The correlation between SWAGX and VTBNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWAGX vs. VTBNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWAGX
SWAGX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SWAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SWAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

VTBNX
VTBNX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VTBNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTBNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTBNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VTBNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTBNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWAGX vs. VTBNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWAGXVTBNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.19

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

1.54

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.02

4.30

-0.29

SWAGX vs. VTBNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the VTBNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWAGX and VTBNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWAGX vs. VTBNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWAGX drawdown since its inception was -19.68%, which is greater than VTBNX's maximum drawdown of -18.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWAGX and VTBNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWAGXVTBNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.68%

-18.71%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-2.83%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.14%

-5.97%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.76%

-18.05%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.71%

-2.52%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.67%

-4.86%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

1.01%

+0.06%

Volatility

SWAGX vs. VTBNX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX) have volatilities of 1.09% and 1.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWAGXVTBNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

1.13%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.96%

2.86%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

3.88%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.09%

5.96%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.11%

4.93%

+0.18%

SWAGX vs. VTBNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWAGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VTBNX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWAGX vs. VTBNX - Dividend Comparison

SWAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than VTBNX's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SWAGX
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund
4.15%4.02%3.88%3.22%1.93%1.56%2.47%2.87%2.80%1.98%0.00%
VTBNX
Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund
4.07%3.95%3.77%3.13%2.54%1.82%3.12%2.79%2.56%2.52%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SWAGX and VTBNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTBNX has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to SWAGX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWAGX dropped -19.68% vs VTBNX's -18.71%.

VTBNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWAGX and VTBNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer