SVR.TO vs. ZUQ.TO
SVR.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF) and ZUQ.TO (BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SVR.TO is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while ZUQ.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SVR.TO returned 13.89%/yr vs 16.38%/yr for ZUQ.TO. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. SVR.TO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for ZUQ.TO.
Performance
SVR.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVR.TO achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than ZUQ.TO's 9.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SVR.TO has underperformed ZUQ.TO with an annualized return of 13.89%, while ZUQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.38% annualized return.
SVR.TO
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 23.49%
- 1Y
- 103.85%
- 3Y*
- 42.79%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- 13.89%
ZUQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 9.39%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 19.10%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 16.38%
SVR.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVR.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF | 1.77% | 140.56% | 18.71% | -0.94% | 0.09% | -13.03% | 42.96% | 12.77% | -9.50% | 4.40% |
ZUQ.TO BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF | 9.39% | 5.78% | 34.02% | 33.24% | -18.33% | 26.40% | 19.92% | 31.74% | 4.70% | 16.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SVR.TO and ZUQ.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014 | -0.01 |
The correlation between SVR.TO and ZUQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SVR.TO vs. ZUQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SVR.TO
ZUQ.TO
SVR.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR.TO) and BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SVR.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 1.81 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.25 | 5.87 | -0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SVR.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 1.56 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.94 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.94 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.94 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
SVR.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVR.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.85%, which is greater than ZUQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVR.TO and ZUQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVR.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.85% | -26.94% | -50.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.63% | -10.57% | -32.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.63% | -17.93% | -24.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.63% | -26.94% | -15.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.52% | -26.94% | -18.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.64% | -0.10% | -37.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.35% | -4.60% | -45.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.85% | 3.26% | +16.59% |
Volatility
SVR.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Silver Bullion ETF (SVR.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.51% compared to BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO) at 2.31%. This indicates that SVR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZUQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SVR.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.51% | 2.31% | +14.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.28% | 9.60% | +46.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.68% | 12.29% | +45.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.45% | 16.35% | +20.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.51% | 17.52% | +14.99% |
SVR.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SVR.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than ZUQ.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
SVR.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
SVR.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZUQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVR.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZUQ.TO BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.57% | 0.86% | 0.99% | 0.80% | 0.96% | 0.96% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 1.00% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SVR.TO and ZUQ.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZUQ.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZUQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SVR.TO.
SVR.TO is categorized as Silver, while ZUQ.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. SVR.TO tracks LBMA Silver Price, while ZUQ.TO tracks MSCI USA Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for SVR.TO and 0.33% for ZUQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for SVR.TO and ZUQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer