SUWS.L vs. WNRG.L
SUWS.L (iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and WNRG.L (State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - SUWS.L tracks the MSCI World SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Net Index (USD) while WNRG.L tracks the MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUWS.L returned 8.91%/yr vs 21.00%/yr for WNRG.L. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SUWS.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for WNRG.L.
Performance
SUWS.L vs. WNRG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUWS.L achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly lower than WNRG.L's 28.55% return.
SUWS.L
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- 6M
- 7.40%
- YTD
- 9.32%
- 1Y
- 16.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.65%
WNRG.L
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 22.72%
- YTD
- 28.55%
- 1Y
- 37.41%
- 3Y*
- 15.85%
- 5Y*
- 21.00%
- 10Y*
- 8.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.95%
SUWS.L vs. WNRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUWS.L iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 9.32% | 14.86% | 11.22% | 25.16% | -21.20% | 25.32% | 21.04% | 29.76% | -7.49% | 4.80% |
WNRG.L State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 28.55% | 14.83% | 2.07% | 3.52% | 46.61% | 38.74% | -30.35% | 9.89% | -14.99% | 6.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUWS.L and WNRG.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2017 | 0.45 |
The correlation between SUWS.L and WNRG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SUWS.L vs. WNRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SUWS.L
WNRG.L
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Technology
SUWS.L
WNRG.L
-
Financial Services
SUWS.L
WNRG.L
-
Industrials
SUWS.L
WNRG.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SUWS.L
WNRG.L
-
Healthcare
SUWS.L
WNRG.L
-
Communication Services
SUWS.L
WNRG.L
Consumer Defensive
SUWS.L
WNRG.L
-
Basic Materials
SUWS.L
WNRG.L
-
Real Estate
SUWS.L
WNRG.L
-
Utilities
SUWS.L
WNRG.L
-
Energy
SUWS.L
-
WNRG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUWS.L vs. WNRG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SUWS.L
WNRG.L
SUWS.L vs. WNRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SUWS.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SUWS.L | WNRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.31 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 2.33 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.72 | 6.68 | +0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SUWS.L vs. WNRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUWS.L drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum WNRG.L drawdown of -68.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUWS.L and WNRG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUWS.L | WNRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.97% | -68.72% | +36.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.56% | -15.98% | +6.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.81% | -18.94% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.06% | -26.55% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -7.60% | +4.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.56% | -17.54% | +11.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 5.59% | -3.09% |
Volatility
SUWS.L vs. WNRG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SUWS.L) is 4.09%, while State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNRG.L) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that SUWS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUWS.L | WNRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 5.91% | -1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.39% | 17.83% | -6.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.93% | 20.65% | -6.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 24.21% | -7.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 33.37% | -16.53% |
SUWS.L vs. WNRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUWS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than WNRG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SUWS.L vs. WNRG.L - Dividend Comparison
SUWS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while WNRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUWS.L iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.21% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.70% | 2.26% |
WNRG.L State Street SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUWS.L and WNRG.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SUWS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SUWS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WNRG.L.
SUWS.L tracks MSCI World SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Net Index (USD), while WNRG.L tracks MSCI World Energy 35/20 Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SUWS.L and 0.30% for WNRG.L.
Find the right allocation for SUWS.L and WNRG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer