PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUWS.L vs. QUID.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUWS.L vs. QUID.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SUWS.L) and PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF (QUID.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SUWS.L is traded in USD, while QUID.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the QUID.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUWS.L achieves a 10.37% return, which is significantly higher than QUID.L's 2.67% return.


SUWS.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
-1.35%
6M
8.12%
YTD
10.37%
1Y
18.55%
3Y*
13.89%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*

QUID.L

1D
0.00%
1M
1.16%
6M
2.59%
YTD
2.67%
1Y
5.46%
3Y*
6.29%
5Y*
2.93%
10Y*
2.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUWS.L vs. QUID.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUWS.L
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
10.37%14.86%11.22%25.16%-21.20%25.32%21.04%29.76%-7.49%4.80%
QUID.L
PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF
2.67%12.80%3.91%10.49%-11.55%-0.98%3.80%5.64%-5.42%2.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SUWS.L and QUID.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2017

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUWS.L vs. QUID.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUWS.L
SUWS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SUWS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUWS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUWS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SUWS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUWS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

QUID.L
QUID.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
QUID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
QUID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUWS.L vs. QUID.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SUWS.L) and PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF (QUID.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SUWS.LQUID.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.14

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

1.16

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.87

2.63

+5.24

SUWS.L vs. QUID.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUWS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the QUID.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUWS.L and QUID.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SUWS.L vs. QUID.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUWS.L drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum QUID.L drawdown of -35.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUWS.L and QUID.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUWS.LQUID.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.97%

-35.66%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-4.45%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.81%

-7.76%

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.06%

-25.00%

-4.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-2.30%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-14.60%

+9.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

1.97%

+0.52%

Volatility

SUWS.L vs. QUID.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SUWS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF (QUID.L) at 1.70%. This indicates that SUWS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUID.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUWS.LQUID.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

1.70%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

5.06%

+6.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.94%

6.68%

+7.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.40%

8.63%

+7.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.85%

8.88%

+7.97%

Dividends

SUWS.L vs. QUID.L - Dividend Comparison

SUWS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than QUID.L's 4.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QUID.L
PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF
4.17%4.19%4.67%3.69%0.66%0.08%0.31%0.73%0.52%0.33%0.59%0.55%
SUWS.L
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.20%1.21%1.41%1.52%1.71%1.20%1.21%1.70%2.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUWS.L and QUID.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SUWS.L tracks iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while QUID.L tracks PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUWS.L and QUID.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer